JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS
Search

Hamza bin Laden: the heir to al Qaeda?

Why has a UK team genetically edited human embryos?

How Russia came to Pakistan’s help?

Defying Courts: What is next for Nawaz Sharif?

Such TV | Rouhani censures Trump’s anti-Iran rhetoric

President Trump calls for a holocaust on the floor of the United Nations

Iran infiltrated US military, obtained proof of ISIS collusion

Saudi plan to ‘accept Israel as a brotherly state’

United States supplying weapons worth $2.2B to Syrian terrorists organization

LUBP | How dishonest “Social Justice Warriors” work to curb the religious freedoms of targeted groups

“Go Nawaz Go” Makes it to Speed Test Server!

UAE ambassador to Ankara threatens Turkey to close down its embassy

Saudi Arabia's king-in-waiting cements grip on power with charm and crackdowns

US paradoxes and Pakistan’s war against terrorism

Free Balochistan: A joint venture of RAW and CIA to burry CPEC

Confidential U.N. report accuses Saudi coalition of killing hundreds of Yemeni kids

Pakistani teenager develops anti-BlueWhale app

UAE’s ambassador to the U.S considers Saudi Arabia responsible for the ruining of the UAE’s good name

Rabbani seeks official response on anti-Pakistan posters in Switzerland

Nawaz Sharif must not appear before NAB court: Maryam

Trump says if threatened, US will 'totally destroy' North Korea

EXCLUSIVE – Interview with Dr. S.M. Kazem Mesbah Mousavi, Imam Ali Centre Canada

More than 800 Shia pilgrims have to stay at Taftan border for a week

Five eminent Shia scholars banned from entering Gilgit under unjust policy of balance

57 accused charge-sheeted in Mashal Khan lynching case

Nisar lashes out at Khaqan Abbasi, Asif for statements on ‘internal matters’

Pakistan team kicks off training, ahead of Sri Lanka series in UAE

Bank of China permitted to start operations in Pakistan

Pakistan protests with Switzerland over ‘Free Balochistan’ posters

Nawaz Sharif, children fail to appear in court; summons reissued

US paradoxes and Pakistan’s war against terrorism

Saudi plan to ‘accept Israel as a brotherly state’

Was NA-120 election rigged?

UAE ambassador to Ankara threatens Turkey to close down its embassy

Saudi Arabia's king-in-waiting cements grip on power with charm and crackdowns

Confidential U.N. report accuses Saudi coalition of killing hundreds of Yemeni kids

Pakistani teenager develops anti-BlueWhale app

US’ Black Hawk Down in Yemen

Outrage in Egypt over Israeli Flag in educational book

Russo-Saudi closeness: What are two sides’ goals?

Arrest warrants: Should Imran Khan present himself before ECP?

Is Establishment pulling NAB’s strings?

How CIA and Raw are funding Pakistani separatists: An Inside story

An old desire: Is Gov trying to place ISI under civilian control?

Certain Western states still back terror groups in Syria: Assad

Iran, Pakistan army chiefs urge Muslim world action to end Rohingya plight

Iraq vice president: Baghdad won't tolerate creation of ‘second Israel’

Myanmar says US official barred from Rohingya conflict zone

Iraq’s Nujaba Movement condemns terrorist attacks in Nasiriyah

Unofficial results show PML-N’s Kulsoom set to win NA-120 by-election

Is China using North Korea to break US's Super power's myth?

US Plan for New Afghan Force Poses Threat to Civilians

UK arms sales benefiting most from Middle East wars

UAE: Saudi Arabia was going to launch military attack on Qatar

US policy shift: Would Pakistan turn into another Iran for US?

Has Trump become a leader of Arab nationalism?

Is Gwadar a toll plaza?

Would a defeat in NA-120 would end PML-N's politics from Punjab?

Rohingyas of Karachi struggle to deal with identity crisis

Guilt of war crimes: Suicide among US war veterans highest in west

Saudi Crown Prince Calls Off Visit to Paris for Fear of Popular Uprising

Iqna | Georgian Muslim Cleric Urges Boycotting Myanmar to End Massacre of Rohingya

Mehr News | ‘Saudi Arabia, Taliban like brothers’

Such TV | JUIF rejects hiring educated imams in KP mosques

Why US is not happy with Deir Ez-Zor’s recapture from ISIS?

The United States and Russia rejected the request of Israel to keep Iran far from the Syrian border

Netanyahu is the Israeli Trump

Paradiagm shift: Pakistan’s big ‘No” to US aid

Did PML-N verbal attacks on Judiciary affected the Panama review appeal?

Saudi Arabia, Sudan banned from Labour party conference

Kulbhoshan Yadav’s case: Why ICJ will not give decision in favor of Pakistan?

Why emergence of Hafiz Saeed linked-MML in Pakistani politics is almost inevitable

UNICEF says 240,000 Rohingya kids in dangerous situation

We will sink Japan and turn US to 'ashes and darkness', says North Korea

Pakistan Still Hasn’t Received Trump’s Demand List

Saudi security: detained preachers are members of spying cell

Russia urges Syria not to retaliate against Israel airstrike

Controversial Saudi Prince detained

Facts hidden by the UAE about its military aircraft crashed in Yemen and the fate of its crew

‘Blue Whale’ taking a bite out of K-P

Who is pressurising NAB to file appeal in Hudaibiya case?

China Backs UN Call for Justice in Yemen; US, Saudis Object to Move

Deepening rift: Would PML-N meet the same fate of MQM?

A dangerous tactics: Why Daesh is targeting IT experts from Pakistan universities?

Ansarullah missiles can reach anywhere in UAE: Houthi

Iran a partner in Syrian victory: Assad's letter to Ayatollah Khamenei

MEHR | Saudi Arabia, Israel paving way for US military presence on China border

LUBP | All Deobandi-Salafi right wings parties are on same Page

Pakistan is Among Bottom 5 Countries for Education & Skills Development

Such News | Pak-China Shaheen-VI joint air exercise underway at China's Korla Air Base

Tasnim | Assad Thanks Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran for Backing Syria in War on Terror

HRW: Israel banks financing settlements

Israel’s war against the United Nations

Iran seeks to send delegation to Myanmar over Rohingya plight

Saudi Arabia’s role in removing Nawaz Sharif revealed

UN's inaction on Saudi Arabia’s bombing of Yemen 'striking': HRW

Pakistan’s cost on war on terror: The story of Sticks with few carrots

Netanyahu, Nikki Haley and the ‘Iranophobia’

Diplomacy of visits: Can Pakistan pursue US to review new Afghan policy?

Did China hold back Pakistan to take stand on Rohingya’s genocide?

2017-07-11 08:35:26

JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?

 

Finally the much awaited JIT report has been submitted to Supreme Court yesterday and now all eyes are on Supreme Court.

 

Some are of the view that the implementation bench will examine the JIT’s report, issue notices to the parties and decide the case, while a few say that the JIT report is for the satisfaction of the judges only and they can decide at their own after the report comes before them.

 

 

Some senior lawyers and legal minds were of the view that implementation bench will send the JIT report to the chief justice who will refer it back to the five-member bench of the Panama case to decide the matter. Some also held that the chief justice can constitute a new bench once the JIT report or the matter is referred to him.

Regarding the use of Article 184(3) to disqualify the prime minister, a few lawyers hesitated in replying to the questions, while others said that they were waiting for the court decision, as it would a whole new thing for them.

 

Some were of the view that the facts against the PM were disputed; therefore, removing him under Article 184(3) would be first of its kind in legal history, while other held that courts can exercise their powers whenever and wherever necessary.

 

 

Similarly, legal minds had different opinions over the debate that the petitions against the PM were of quo warranto. Some rejected the assertion, while other spoke in its favour. Many shied away from giving their point of view on the current issue.

 

 

Salman Akram Raja, when contacted by The News, said that the three judges of the implementation bench will decide the case once the JIT report comes before them. They can dispose of the case, they can send a reference, they can pass an order or they can refer the case to the chief justice for further action.

 

 

He maintained that a Supreme Court bench can pass any order and the implementation bench is a full-fledged bench; therefore, it can pass any order and decide the case in hand. While commenting on the debate that the petition against the PM is whether a quo warranto petition or not, Raja maintained that in a quo warranto petition, the facts are never disputed. For instance, a person is holding a position at 62 years of age while the maximum age limit for that post is 60 years and he is not disputing his date of birth; therefore a quo warranto can be filed in that case but not in the case of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif where there are allegations (not proved anywhere) of something done in 1993 but the fact have not been established yet.

 

 

Facts are established in a trial court and neither the Supreme Court nor JIT is a trail court; therefore, there does not arise any question of quo warranto against the PM. He was of the view that when the JIT report is presented before the Supreme Court, objections would be raised on it if any party is aggrieved, and the parties could be issued notices on the JIT report.

 

 

Akram Sheikh commented said the chief Justice formed an implementation bench based on the April 20 judgement and in all those cases, where commissions are formed, the report of the commission is presented before the court and all the parties are issued notices, while the report is always subjected to cross examination.

 

 

He mentioned that the JIT formed in the case of Panama Papers is actually a commission formed under Order 26, Rule (1) of the Supreme Court Rules and Orders 1980; therefore its recommendations will be cross examined in the court.

 

 

He added that the JIT report would be sent to the chief justice who will decide which bench should hear the case and in his opinion the case cannot go to the same five-member bench because two among them have already opined on the case. Therefore either a new bench or a larger bench would be formed as it is entirely up to the chief justice to decide.

 

 

He held that the Panama Papers case has not been decided yet because two judges of the five-member bench have opined that the PM stands disqualified, while the three judges required further investigation which meant that they have ordered an inquiry and have not yet decided the case.

 

 

Akram Sheikh stated that it is the chief justice’s jurisdiction to refer the matter to either the same three judges, or form a new bench to decide the fate of JIT report.

 

 

One of the most respected legal minds of the country, Justice (retd) Wajiuddin Ahmad, explained the procedure that the three judges of the five-member bench had requested the chief justice to form an implementation bench for their judgement of further probe into the affairs of the Sharif family. The chief justice formed a three-member bench comprising the same three judges. Now when the JIT’s report comes with whatever remarks and findings, it would be sent to the chief justice.

 

 

“Normally, the chief justice has the powers to form benches but in the cases where a judgement has already been passed, the chief justice has no powers to change the bench; therefore, the chief justice is bound to send the JIT report before the five judges of Panama Papers case who had earlier given a verdict on April 20,” said the retired judge.

 

 

He added: “Those five judges will then decide about the case. Either the two judges who had said that PM stands disqualified might change their judgement as they would have an option or the three judges who order the further investigation would take a decision regarding PM’s disqualification.”

 

 

Former Attorney General of Pakistan Irfan Qadir, when contacted for his views, said that the two judges have given their decision in the case while three have not given any verdict; therefore, when a verdict has not come forth it cannot be implemented. What is happening is that a bench is facilitating an investigation through JIT, because had there been any decision then there would have been its execution which is not the case.

He said upon JIT’s report, the bench will have to issue notices to the parties and make the report public because the Supreme Court is in no position to deal the JIT report in-camera.

 

 

He was of the view that the chief justice must form a larger bench to decide the matter of disqualification through courts under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. “The larger Bench will have to revisit past precedents where people were disqualified from being MPs through courts, while it was not the duty of the courts to disqualify an MP and by this way court will purify itself,” Qadir held.

 

 

He said it started during Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry’s period when fake degree holders were disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution and now it was high time that the courts come clean on disqualifications under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

 

 

SCBA President Rasheed A Rizvi when contacted said in his opinion, the three judges bench is in fact an implementation bench for order of the court passed on April 20; therefore, when JIT submits its report, all the parties would be issued notices and the issue will again land before the five-member bench to decide the case.

 

 

Rizvi was of the view that the JIT report will be subjected to cross examination by anyone against whom something might be written in the report.

 

 

He explained that the JIT might say that the petitioner has not cooperated or any of the accused has not cooperated, so that person would be given the right to defend himself before the court decision.

 

Babar Sattar, talking to this correspondent, held that the three member bench of the SC has to determine the fate of the case before them after considering the JIT report and calling for objections over it, if anyone has. He mentioned that the original five-member bench has given its final verdict of which two judges have has said that PM stands disqualified while three ordered a thorough inquiry into the allegations against the PM’s family.

 

“It was not necessary that the three judges of the Panama case bench were to become members of the implementation bench but the chief Justice constituted the bench and included the same three judges,” said Babar Sattar.

 

He added that this bench has to decide whether it can remove a parliamentarian under Article 184(3) of the Constitution or not. “In the past, the fake degree holders have been disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution but facts were not disputed there so they were disqualified”, the lawyer added.

He maintained that in the past, no parliamentarian has been removed from his office over disputed facts and it is yet to see what the implementation bench orders.

 

 

To a question, Sattar replied that the case against the PM is not of a quo warranto because so far facts have not been established. Once the JIT report comes and the court gives a declaration under Article 62-63 of the Constitution, then after a whole process, a quo warranto can be filed but the instant case is not a case of quo warranto against the PM.

 

 

Barrister Ali Zafar said it is a settled principle that there would not be an immediate decision on the JIT report and the report would be dispatched to the parties on the principle of fair trial. If it is against someone then reply would be sought from him and a decision would be taken.

 

 

He mentioned that it may take another 30 days for the bench to pronounce a decision on the JIT report. He was of the view that the JIT report would be thoroughly scrutinised by the lawyers of the aggrieved parties (if any) and then a decision would come.

 

Ikram Chaudhary said one thing must be kept in mind that it is an implementation bench which would be hearing the matter on the day when JIT submits its reply; therefore, it has to take a decision on the JIT report.

 

 

“There is no need for further trial as the JIT is working for the satisfaction of the three judges who had ordered in the April 20 judgement that a further probe is required into the Sharif family’s monetary affairs in order to get a clear picture whether prime minister stands disqualified or not, And if anyone of these judges says that Nawaz Sharif is disqualified, the April 20 Judgement will become 3-2 majority with three judges saying the PM stands disqualified,” said the senior lawyer

 

 

“There is no precedent available of such an incident where a minority judgement becomes majority after a subsequent probe and satisfaction by the same judges,” he added.

 

 

Chaudhary mentioned that the PM will have the right of review in such a case. He said though the contents of the JIT report could be challenged before the NAB, FIA or SECP where the case would further land for necessary action but not at the Supreme Court level.

 

Azhar Siddique, when contacted, said the three member implementation bench will examine the JIT report and can summon the prime minister, if necessary, and will order his disqualification in case of any incriminating evidence brought up by the JIT.

 

 

He said it has been written in the para four of the April 20 judgement that the bench can disqualify the PM if it is satisfied with the JIT report. If the JIT brings some incriminating evidence against other members of the Sharif family then the issue can be referred to the five-member bench, only to the extent of sending reference against the accused persons.

 

Siddique was of the view that of the petitions against the PM, one was a quo warranto, seeking his disqualification under Article 62-63 of the Constitution and in the past, the court had taken cognizance of the matters having disputed facts but in the instant case, two out of the five judges have given a verdict on the evidence brought before them while others ordered a further probe.

 

The News

pk.shafaqna.com

Categories:  
Tags:   PML-N ، nawaz sharif ، JIT ، Supreme Court ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)

Press agenda on September 21

- worldbulletin.net

UAF inks agreement

- Tribune PK

US Reckless War Bluff

- Islam Times

Security clean-up

- Tribune PK

Crime and punishment

- Tribune PK