JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS

Saudi Arabia eases blockade, reopens Yemen’s Hudaydah port

155 killed in Egypt mosque attack

Saudi Arabia receives Pakistani Special Forces

Report: Detained Saudi princes face prison if they do not give up their wealth

Local Afghan Leaders Protest Deadly US Strikes on ‘Heroin Labs’

Iran’s supreme leader is the 'new Hitler' of Middle East: Saudi crown prince

Lebanon army on alert for possible threat from Israel

Former Saudi minister says violence unacceptable even in Israel

Would India really allow US to act against TTP?

Is Pakistan under last transitional phase?

AIG Ashraf Noor martyred in Peshawar suicide blast

Google tracks users even with location services disabled

New Saudi counterterrorism law aims to silence critics: HRW

Islamabad siege: Did TLYR achieve the motives of dharna?

Israeli man's selfies at Masjid-e-Nabwi: A moment of shame for Saudia

At the brink of bankruptcy: Is Pakistan economy at the verge of destruction?

Saudi-Israel normalisation, a gift to Iran

Abbas ready for ‘historic’ peace deal under Trump

Ayatollah Khameni : Bringing US to its knees in region a miracle of Islamic revolution

Jolt to India: Why did Pakistan set Hafiz Saeed free?

MMA Again: The light in the end of tunnel for Fazal ur Rehman

North Korean media called Trump a “rabid dog” and sentenced him to death

Putin to talk with Saudi King Salman following Assad’s Russia meeting

Teenagers aged upto 12 sold for prostitution

Afghan Army Recruitment Dwindles Amid Taliban Threats

Gen. Soleimani’s message to Ayatollah Khamenei

Declared absconder : Is Ishaq Dar in a real fix?

India cancels $500m arms deal with Israel

Assad and Putin discuss end game in Syria

Arab League emergency meeting: Divisions fail decisions

Why Did Saudia summon COAS and Pakistan PM?

The difference between the Sunnis and the Takfiri Wahhabism!

Who conspired against Khatm.e.Nubuwwat (PBUH) law?

Dirty Politics: PTI’s blunder of making alliance with Taliban’s father

Myanmar’s treatment of Rohingya Muslims ‘a dehumanising apartheid’: Amnesty report

Scientists warns of upsurge in major earthquakes in 2018

UNGA resolution: Is Pakistan on right track for Kashmir’s freedom?

Imran Khan paves way for father of Deobandi Taliban to his new Pakistan

Rana Sanaullah blames Intelligence Agencies for Shirazi kidnapping

Report: Saudi Arabia deficit reaches $32.4bn

Russia eyes active role in Afghanistan, breaking with three-decade restraint

While Saudi Arabia discusses Iran and Hezbollah in Cairo, its plans for Lebanon are backfiring

Afghanistan opium cultivation: A bigger threat than ISIS to Pakistan and Iran

Why Nawaz Sharif is hesitant to remove Ishaq Dar?

Can Islamabad protests lead into Military take over?

Iran: Saudi-drafted Arab League statement full of lies, worthless

Nasrallah: US did what it could to help Daesh in Syria's Bukamal

Interior Minister gets 48 hours to evict defiant Islamabad protesters

ABNA | Syrian civilian killed, material damaged in terrorist rocket attacks in Damascus

Pakistan nears its moment of truth

MERH | Study indicates discrimination against Shias in Bahrain

The Prophet, an ‘Ummi’..

Does Israel has secret ties with 'many' Arab, Muslim states?

Why Pentagon persuaded Congress to delink LeT from Haqqani network?

Security council appointed panel says no missiles sent to Houthis, refuting Saudi Arabia claim

The conditional release of Saad al-Hariri; Saudi Arabia kept his two children in Riyadh

How has Islamophobia changed over the past 20 years?

Saudi: Palestinian Abbas must endorse US’ plan or leave

Egyptian authorities crack down on televised fatwas

Saudi Arabia’s empty trumpeting for war against Iran

Replacing Finance minister: Is PML-N going to make Ishaq Dar a perfect scapegoat?

Faizabad sit in: Is another model town like action in the offing?

Is Shahbaz Sharif deliberately weakening PML-N?

Would Nawaz seek a presidential pardon?

Senior Iranian official warns Macron against meddling in Iran’s internal affairs

Palestine to freeze ties with US if Trump admin closes mission in Washington

The Martyrdom of Imam Hassan (AS)

Lebanese PM Accepts France Invite: Will This End Crisis?

Arab media: Baghdad not ready to host Saudi Crown Prince

Barzani seeking to mend ties with Iran, worrying US

The series of the arrogant prince

US troops told to ignore child abuse in Afghanistan

Shafaqna special: Did PML-N launch Tehrik.e.Labaik?

Balochistan mass murder:  A terrorist activity or human trafficking?

TTP in Afghanistan: How does Abdullah Abdullah’s confession shift burden from Pakistan to US?

Free Balochistan posters: A new game plan against CPEC

Lebanon's Hariri leaves Saudi capital for France: Lebanese TV

Saudi siege of Yemen leaves three cities without clean water: Red Cross

Social Structure Founded by the Prophet (pbuh)

Death and Burial of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

How has Islamophobia changed over the past 20 years?

West Eyes Nuclear Deal-Style Missile Pact with Iran

Saudi Arabia’s Desperate Moves against Hezbollah

International conference on lovers of Ahlul Bayt (as) and the Takfiri issue

3,000 more US troops deployed to Afghanistan: Pentagon

US Claims North Korea Behind FALLCHILL Malware

Saudi Arabia and Israel want to drag US into war against Iran: Former CIA officer

The story of a French woman who married four ISIS terrorists

'Saudi King Salman to step down next week'

Pakistan, US trade blame over cross-border terrorism

Delinking LeT from Haqqani network: Did US ditch India?

Is PTI backing Tehreek-e-Labbaik protests?

Israel ready to share intel on Iran with Saudi Arabia: Military chief

Saudi Arabia blackmailing detained princes to fill state coffers: Report

Netanyahu: Israel Will Act Alone to Force Iran Out of Syria

50,000 Yemeni children will die by end of the year, says Save the Children

Saudi storms home of detained cleric Salman Al-Ouda

Morsi tells lawyer of threats to his life

How Israel and Saudi Arabia Conspire to Seize Control of the Middle East?

How Trump’s CIA Used Bin Laden Files and a Neocon Think Tank to Escalate Tensions With Iran

2017-07-11 08:35:26

JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?


Finally the much awaited JIT report has been submitted to Supreme Court yesterday and now all eyes are on Supreme Court.


Some are of the view that the implementation bench will examine the JIT’s report, issue notices to the parties and decide the case, while a few say that the JIT report is for the satisfaction of the judges only and they can decide at their own after the report comes before them.



Some senior lawyers and legal minds were of the view that implementation bench will send the JIT report to the chief justice who will refer it back to the five-member bench of the Panama case to decide the matter. Some also held that the chief justice can constitute a new bench once the JIT report or the matter is referred to him.

Regarding the use of Article 184(3) to disqualify the prime minister, a few lawyers hesitated in replying to the questions, while others said that they were waiting for the court decision, as it would a whole new thing for them.


Some were of the view that the facts against the PM were disputed; therefore, removing him under Article 184(3) would be first of its kind in legal history, while other held that courts can exercise their powers whenever and wherever necessary.



Similarly, legal minds had different opinions over the debate that the petitions against the PM were of quo warranto. Some rejected the assertion, while other spoke in its favour. Many shied away from giving their point of view on the current issue.



Salman Akram Raja, when contacted by The News, said that the three judges of the implementation bench will decide the case once the JIT report comes before them. They can dispose of the case, they can send a reference, they can pass an order or they can refer the case to the chief justice for further action.



He maintained that a Supreme Court bench can pass any order and the implementation bench is a full-fledged bench; therefore, it can pass any order and decide the case in hand. While commenting on the debate that the petition against the PM is whether a quo warranto petition or not, Raja maintained that in a quo warranto petition, the facts are never disputed. For instance, a person is holding a position at 62 years of age while the maximum age limit for that post is 60 years and he is not disputing his date of birth; therefore a quo warranto can be filed in that case but not in the case of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif where there are allegations (not proved anywhere) of something done in 1993 but the fact have not been established yet.



Facts are established in a trial court and neither the Supreme Court nor JIT is a trail court; therefore, there does not arise any question of quo warranto against the PM. He was of the view that when the JIT report is presented before the Supreme Court, objections would be raised on it if any party is aggrieved, and the parties could be issued notices on the JIT report.



Akram Sheikh commented said the chief Justice formed an implementation bench based on the April 20 judgement and in all those cases, where commissions are formed, the report of the commission is presented before the court and all the parties are issued notices, while the report is always subjected to cross examination.



He mentioned that the JIT formed in the case of Panama Papers is actually a commission formed under Order 26, Rule (1) of the Supreme Court Rules and Orders 1980; therefore its recommendations will be cross examined in the court.



He added that the JIT report would be sent to the chief justice who will decide which bench should hear the case and in his opinion the case cannot go to the same five-member bench because two among them have already opined on the case. Therefore either a new bench or a larger bench would be formed as it is entirely up to the chief justice to decide.



He held that the Panama Papers case has not been decided yet because two judges of the five-member bench have opined that the PM stands disqualified, while the three judges required further investigation which meant that they have ordered an inquiry and have not yet decided the case.



Akram Sheikh stated that it is the chief justice’s jurisdiction to refer the matter to either the same three judges, or form a new bench to decide the fate of JIT report.



One of the most respected legal minds of the country, Justice (retd) Wajiuddin Ahmad, explained the procedure that the three judges of the five-member bench had requested the chief justice to form an implementation bench for their judgement of further probe into the affairs of the Sharif family. The chief justice formed a three-member bench comprising the same three judges. Now when the JIT’s report comes with whatever remarks and findings, it would be sent to the chief justice.



“Normally, the chief justice has the powers to form benches but in the cases where a judgement has already been passed, the chief justice has no powers to change the bench; therefore, the chief justice is bound to send the JIT report before the five judges of Panama Papers case who had earlier given a verdict on April 20,” said the retired judge.



He added: “Those five judges will then decide about the case. Either the two judges who had said that PM stands disqualified might change their judgement as they would have an option or the three judges who order the further investigation would take a decision regarding PM’s disqualification.”



Former Attorney General of Pakistan Irfan Qadir, when contacted for his views, said that the two judges have given their decision in the case while three have not given any verdict; therefore, when a verdict has not come forth it cannot be implemented. What is happening is that a bench is facilitating an investigation through JIT, because had there been any decision then there would have been its execution which is not the case.

He said upon JIT’s report, the bench will have to issue notices to the parties and make the report public because the Supreme Court is in no position to deal the JIT report in-camera.



He was of the view that the chief justice must form a larger bench to decide the matter of disqualification through courts under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. “The larger Bench will have to revisit past precedents where people were disqualified from being MPs through courts, while it was not the duty of the courts to disqualify an MP and by this way court will purify itself,” Qadir held.



He said it started during Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry’s period when fake degree holders were disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution and now it was high time that the courts come clean on disqualifications under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.



SCBA President Rasheed A Rizvi when contacted said in his opinion, the three judges bench is in fact an implementation bench for order of the court passed on April 20; therefore, when JIT submits its report, all the parties would be issued notices and the issue will again land before the five-member bench to decide the case.



Rizvi was of the view that the JIT report will be subjected to cross examination by anyone against whom something might be written in the report.



He explained that the JIT might say that the petitioner has not cooperated or any of the accused has not cooperated, so that person would be given the right to defend himself before the court decision.


Babar Sattar, talking to this correspondent, held that the three member bench of the SC has to determine the fate of the case before them after considering the JIT report and calling for objections over it, if anyone has. He mentioned that the original five-member bench has given its final verdict of which two judges have has said that PM stands disqualified while three ordered a thorough inquiry into the allegations against the PM’s family.


“It was not necessary that the three judges of the Panama case bench were to become members of the implementation bench but the chief Justice constituted the bench and included the same three judges,” said Babar Sattar.


He added that this bench has to decide whether it can remove a parliamentarian under Article 184(3) of the Constitution or not. “In the past, the fake degree holders have been disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution but facts were not disputed there so they were disqualified”, the lawyer added.

He maintained that in the past, no parliamentarian has been removed from his office over disputed facts and it is yet to see what the implementation bench orders.



To a question, Sattar replied that the case against the PM is not of a quo warranto because so far facts have not been established. Once the JIT report comes and the court gives a declaration under Article 62-63 of the Constitution, then after a whole process, a quo warranto can be filed but the instant case is not a case of quo warranto against the PM.



Barrister Ali Zafar said it is a settled principle that there would not be an immediate decision on the JIT report and the report would be dispatched to the parties on the principle of fair trial. If it is against someone then reply would be sought from him and a decision would be taken.



He mentioned that it may take another 30 days for the bench to pronounce a decision on the JIT report. He was of the view that the JIT report would be thoroughly scrutinised by the lawyers of the aggrieved parties (if any) and then a decision would come.


Ikram Chaudhary said one thing must be kept in mind that it is an implementation bench which would be hearing the matter on the day when JIT submits its reply; therefore, it has to take a decision on the JIT report.



“There is no need for further trial as the JIT is working for the satisfaction of the three judges who had ordered in the April 20 judgement that a further probe is required into the Sharif family’s monetary affairs in order to get a clear picture whether prime minister stands disqualified or not, And if anyone of these judges says that Nawaz Sharif is disqualified, the April 20 Judgement will become 3-2 majority with three judges saying the PM stands disqualified,” said the senior lawyer



“There is no precedent available of such an incident where a minority judgement becomes majority after a subsequent probe and satisfaction by the same judges,” he added.



Chaudhary mentioned that the PM will have the right of review in such a case. He said though the contents of the JIT report could be challenged before the NAB, FIA or SECP where the case would further land for necessary action but not at the Supreme Court level.


Azhar Siddique, when contacted, said the three member implementation bench will examine the JIT report and can summon the prime minister, if necessary, and will order his disqualification in case of any incriminating evidence brought up by the JIT.



He said it has been written in the para four of the April 20 judgement that the bench can disqualify the PM if it is satisfied with the JIT report. If the JIT brings some incriminating evidence against other members of the Sharif family then the issue can be referred to the five-member bench, only to the extent of sending reference against the accused persons.


Siddique was of the view that of the petitions against the PM, one was a quo warranto, seeking his disqualification under Article 62-63 of the Constitution and in the past, the court had taken cognizance of the matters having disputed facts but in the instant case, two out of the five judges have given a verdict on the evidence brought before them while others ordered a further probe.


The News


Tags:   PML-N ، nawaz sharif ، JIT ، Supreme Court ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)