JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS
Search

Saudi regime faces certain defeat in Yemen

TAPI ceremony brings Pakistan and India closer despite LoC violations

Saudi enslavement of Pakistan

White Helmets Ready for False-Flag Chemical Attack in Syria

Did Nawaz seek Modi's help to rescue him?

Saudi Arabia using Israeli language against Iran, Senator Aitzaz says

Peshawar Zalmi take on Multan Sultans in PSL 2018 opening fixture

Democracy was harmed for saving a person: Imran Khan

Nawaz Sharif seeks confrontation in judiciary, Parliament: Bilawal

ECP dismisses PML-N plea, declares its Senate candidates Independent

48 million Americans suffer from hunger

South Africa to cut diplomatic ties with Israel

Is Shahbaz Sharif stabbing Nawaz in the back?

Ghouta residents ‘wait for death’ amid holocaust

Pakistan adopts latest IAEA’s protocols on nuclear trade

Pakistan Deploys 1,000 Troops to Saudi Arabia amid Yemen War: Reasons, Consequences

Religious scholars to assist IHC in election act case

Nawaz Sharif: A Victim of his own Dirty schemes and Avarice

Supreme Court bars disqualified Nawaz Sharif from heading PML-N

Nawaz Sharif disqualified from party leadership

Iran and Qatar launch joint chamber of commerce

Hindu temple opens in Abu Dhabi .. Why the UAE seeks to appease Hindus?

Sharif family is a master of lies, deceit and hypocrisy, says Bilawal Bhutto

Syria blames West support for terrorists in a letter to UN

US motion to put Pakistan on terror financing watchlist differed

Senator fears Pakistani troops could get pulled into Yemen conflict

Russia will continue to boost Pakistan’s counterterrorism capacity, says FM Lavrov

Why US not trustworthy ally for Turkey

We can’t fight war of others on our soil, says Khawaja Asif

Constitution more supreme to parliament, remarks CJP

China woos Baloch militants to secure CPEC projects

PSL 3 trophy unveiling ceremony held in Dubai

Pakistani troops in the kingdom: A sudden and unexplained missive

Imran Khan suggests direct Senate elections to avoid horse-trading

Does parliament need judges’ say to legislate, asks PM

Pakistan, Azerbaijan enjoy cordial relations: Afzal

Why does Maryam relate all thief references with Nawaz, wonders Aitzaz Ahsan

Interior ministry refuses to put Sharif family’s names on ECL

PSL 2018: All you need to know about leagues, players

Photo of four women playing board game at Khana-e-Kaaba goes viral

Details of troops' deployment in Saudi Arabia can't be revealed: Senate told

Australia, US, India and Japan in talks to counter China’s spreading influence

Khawaja Asif leaves for Russia on 4-day visit

The tourist, found her way in Mashhad

French Noha at Imam Khoi Culture Center on Shahadat of Lady Fatima (S.A)

Pakistan looks to China, Saudi Arabia for succour

Iraqi court sentences Turkish woman to death for joining Islamic State

Impending crisis stopped PM from banning JuD, FIF

Yemen war: Trial time for Saudi Arabia?

US Muslims raise funds to assist Florida terrorist attack victims, Families

People to take revenge of my disqualification in 2018 polls: Nawaz

Imran’s third wedding news confirmed, Pictures released

Sharifs assets worth Rs58m 18 years back, court told

Who will keep Asma’s flame burning?

Sunnis are assured of Imam Mahdi’s reappearance: Sunni cleric

Bahraini Regime Committed Some 1,000 Human Rights Abuses in 1 Month: Report

Iran plane crash: All 66 people on board dead, says airline

Martyrdom of Hazrat Fatima (S.A)

The Story of Hazrat Fatima (sa), daughter of the Holy Prophet (pbuh)

US meddles in foreign nations elections for 'democracy': Ex CIA director

Zardari retracts statement calling Rao Anwar ‘brave kid’

PM sanctioned troop deployment to Saudi Arabia for ‘advisory purpose’

Shoaib Akhtar appointed PCB brand ambassador

‘Bajwa Doctrine’ working well against American blackmail

No militant camps exist on Pakistani soil: COAS

DRINKING HOT TEA CAN INCREASE RISK OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Cannot wait to lift PSL trophy in Karachi: Sammy

Are Young People Abandoning Facebook or Not?

What’s behind Iranian President’s India visit?

Abbasi decides to abolish Gilgit-Baltistan Council

Why Asif Zardari defended Rao Anwar?

Zainab’s murderer sentenced to death by hanging on four counts

The View of Islam on the People and the Government

Senate summons defence minister over sending troops to Saudi Arabia

Abbasi gives go-ahead to PIA, PSM privatisation

US security services express fear of Pakistan’s nuclear program

Myanmar ready to take back Rohingya refugees

Why Shia-Sunni Unity Is Necessary & Important? Ayatollah Khamenei's Opinion

Farooq Sattar backs down; withdraws from selection of Senate candidates

PML-N instigated me to speak against army, offered Senate ticket in return: Ayesha Gulalai

Kuwaiti Emir hails Iran’s role in war on ISIS terror group

Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Rao Anwar

US, UK joint efforts to put Pakistan on terror watchlist

Florida school terrorist supports Trump, white supremacy, hates Muslims

Hasan Ali doubtful for initial PSL matches, Umaid Asif joins as cover

PRESS TV | Takfiri groups, a creation of West to divide Muslims: Iran president

Supporting terrorists, main objective of US-led coalition: Syria

Pak Army destroys Indian post targeting innocent civilians along LoC

Pakistan to station army contingent in Saudi Arabia: ISPR

Asma Jahangir and pseudo liberalism – by Peja Mistry

CJ directs Nawaz Sharif’s counsel to focus on trial

Sayyed Razi: Life and Work

What led to the fall of MQM-P

Language being used by judges is not appropriate: Nawaz

Wooing Iran: Jandullah declared as banned outfit by Pakistan

UK to send Royal Navy warship through disputed South China Sea in challenge to Beijing

NA-154 defeat: Did People reject PTI?

Is Pakistan Shia Democrats Alliance formed under PSP agenda?

Are non-state actors trying to incite war between India and Pakistan?

US pushes motion to put Pakistan on global terrorist-financing watchlist

2017-07-11 08:35:26

JIT report submitted: What is inside the bag?

 

Finally the much awaited JIT report has been submitted to Supreme Court yesterday and now all eyes are on Supreme Court.

 

Some are of the view that the implementation bench will examine the JIT’s report, issue notices to the parties and decide the case, while a few say that the JIT report is for the satisfaction of the judges only and they can decide at their own after the report comes before them.

 

 

Some senior lawyers and legal minds were of the view that implementation bench will send the JIT report to the chief justice who will refer it back to the five-member bench of the Panama case to decide the matter. Some also held that the chief justice can constitute a new bench once the JIT report or the matter is referred to him.

Regarding the use of Article 184(3) to disqualify the prime minister, a few lawyers hesitated in replying to the questions, while others said that they were waiting for the court decision, as it would a whole new thing for them.

 

Some were of the view that the facts against the PM were disputed; therefore, removing him under Article 184(3) would be first of its kind in legal history, while other held that courts can exercise their powers whenever and wherever necessary.

 

 

Similarly, legal minds had different opinions over the debate that the petitions against the PM were of quo warranto. Some rejected the assertion, while other spoke in its favour. Many shied away from giving their point of view on the current issue.

 

 

Salman Akram Raja, when contacted by The News, said that the three judges of the implementation bench will decide the case once the JIT report comes before them. They can dispose of the case, they can send a reference, they can pass an order or they can refer the case to the chief justice for further action.

 

 

He maintained that a Supreme Court bench can pass any order and the implementation bench is a full-fledged bench; therefore, it can pass any order and decide the case in hand. While commenting on the debate that the petition against the PM is whether a quo warranto petition or not, Raja maintained that in a quo warranto petition, the facts are never disputed. For instance, a person is holding a position at 62 years of age while the maximum age limit for that post is 60 years and he is not disputing his date of birth; therefore a quo warranto can be filed in that case but not in the case of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif where there are allegations (not proved anywhere) of something done in 1993 but the fact have not been established yet.

 

 

Facts are established in a trial court and neither the Supreme Court nor JIT is a trail court; therefore, there does not arise any question of quo warranto against the PM. He was of the view that when the JIT report is presented before the Supreme Court, objections would be raised on it if any party is aggrieved, and the parties could be issued notices on the JIT report.

 

 

Akram Sheikh commented said the chief Justice formed an implementation bench based on the April 20 judgement and in all those cases, where commissions are formed, the report of the commission is presented before the court and all the parties are issued notices, while the report is always subjected to cross examination.

 

 

He mentioned that the JIT formed in the case of Panama Papers is actually a commission formed under Order 26, Rule (1) of the Supreme Court Rules and Orders 1980; therefore its recommendations will be cross examined in the court.

 

 

He added that the JIT report would be sent to the chief justice who will decide which bench should hear the case and in his opinion the case cannot go to the same five-member bench because two among them have already opined on the case. Therefore either a new bench or a larger bench would be formed as it is entirely up to the chief justice to decide.

 

 

He held that the Panama Papers case has not been decided yet because two judges of the five-member bench have opined that the PM stands disqualified, while the three judges required further investigation which meant that they have ordered an inquiry and have not yet decided the case.

 

 

Akram Sheikh stated that it is the chief justice’s jurisdiction to refer the matter to either the same three judges, or form a new bench to decide the fate of JIT report.

 

 

One of the most respected legal minds of the country, Justice (retd) Wajiuddin Ahmad, explained the procedure that the three judges of the five-member bench had requested the chief justice to form an implementation bench for their judgement of further probe into the affairs of the Sharif family. The chief justice formed a three-member bench comprising the same three judges. Now when the JIT’s report comes with whatever remarks and findings, it would be sent to the chief justice.

 

 

“Normally, the chief justice has the powers to form benches but in the cases where a judgement has already been passed, the chief justice has no powers to change the bench; therefore, the chief justice is bound to send the JIT report before the five judges of Panama Papers case who had earlier given a verdict on April 20,” said the retired judge.

 

 

He added: “Those five judges will then decide about the case. Either the two judges who had said that PM stands disqualified might change their judgement as they would have an option or the three judges who order the further investigation would take a decision regarding PM’s disqualification.”

 

 

Former Attorney General of Pakistan Irfan Qadir, when contacted for his views, said that the two judges have given their decision in the case while three have not given any verdict; therefore, when a verdict has not come forth it cannot be implemented. What is happening is that a bench is facilitating an investigation through JIT, because had there been any decision then there would have been its execution which is not the case.

He said upon JIT’s report, the bench will have to issue notices to the parties and make the report public because the Supreme Court is in no position to deal the JIT report in-camera.

 

 

He was of the view that the chief justice must form a larger bench to decide the matter of disqualification through courts under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. “The larger Bench will have to revisit past precedents where people were disqualified from being MPs through courts, while it was not the duty of the courts to disqualify an MP and by this way court will purify itself,” Qadir held.

 

 

He said it started during Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry’s period when fake degree holders were disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution and now it was high time that the courts come clean on disqualifications under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

 

 

SCBA President Rasheed A Rizvi when contacted said in his opinion, the three judges bench is in fact an implementation bench for order of the court passed on April 20; therefore, when JIT submits its report, all the parties would be issued notices and the issue will again land before the five-member bench to decide the case.

 

 

Rizvi was of the view that the JIT report will be subjected to cross examination by anyone against whom something might be written in the report.

 

 

He explained that the JIT might say that the petitioner has not cooperated or any of the accused has not cooperated, so that person would be given the right to defend himself before the court decision.

 

Babar Sattar, talking to this correspondent, held that the three member bench of the SC has to determine the fate of the case before them after considering the JIT report and calling for objections over it, if anyone has. He mentioned that the original five-member bench has given its final verdict of which two judges have has said that PM stands disqualified while three ordered a thorough inquiry into the allegations against the PM’s family.

 

“It was not necessary that the three judges of the Panama case bench were to become members of the implementation bench but the chief Justice constituted the bench and included the same three judges,” said Babar Sattar.

 

He added that this bench has to decide whether it can remove a parliamentarian under Article 184(3) of the Constitution or not. “In the past, the fake degree holders have been disqualified under Article 184(3) of the Constitution but facts were not disputed there so they were disqualified”, the lawyer added.

He maintained that in the past, no parliamentarian has been removed from his office over disputed facts and it is yet to see what the implementation bench orders.

 

 

To a question, Sattar replied that the case against the PM is not of a quo warranto because so far facts have not been established. Once the JIT report comes and the court gives a declaration under Article 62-63 of the Constitution, then after a whole process, a quo warranto can be filed but the instant case is not a case of quo warranto against the PM.

 

 

Barrister Ali Zafar said it is a settled principle that there would not be an immediate decision on the JIT report and the report would be dispatched to the parties on the principle of fair trial. If it is against someone then reply would be sought from him and a decision would be taken.

 

 

He mentioned that it may take another 30 days for the bench to pronounce a decision on the JIT report. He was of the view that the JIT report would be thoroughly scrutinised by the lawyers of the aggrieved parties (if any) and then a decision would come.

 

Ikram Chaudhary said one thing must be kept in mind that it is an implementation bench which would be hearing the matter on the day when JIT submits its reply; therefore, it has to take a decision on the JIT report.

 

 

“There is no need for further trial as the JIT is working for the satisfaction of the three judges who had ordered in the April 20 judgement that a further probe is required into the Sharif family’s monetary affairs in order to get a clear picture whether prime minister stands disqualified or not, And if anyone of these judges says that Nawaz Sharif is disqualified, the April 20 Judgement will become 3-2 majority with three judges saying the PM stands disqualified,” said the senior lawyer

 

 

“There is no precedent available of such an incident where a minority judgement becomes majority after a subsequent probe and satisfaction by the same judges,” he added.

 

 

Chaudhary mentioned that the PM will have the right of review in such a case. He said though the contents of the JIT report could be challenged before the NAB, FIA or SECP where the case would further land for necessary action but not at the Supreme Court level.

 

Azhar Siddique, when contacted, said the three member implementation bench will examine the JIT report and can summon the prime minister, if necessary, and will order his disqualification in case of any incriminating evidence brought up by the JIT.

 

 

He said it has been written in the para four of the April 20 judgement that the bench can disqualify the PM if it is satisfied with the JIT report. If the JIT brings some incriminating evidence against other members of the Sharif family then the issue can be referred to the five-member bench, only to the extent of sending reference against the accused persons.

 

Siddique was of the view that of the petitions against the PM, one was a quo warranto, seeking his disqualification under Article 62-63 of the Constitution and in the past, the court had taken cognizance of the matters having disputed facts but in the instant case, two out of the five judges have given a verdict on the evidence brought before them while others ordered a further probe.

 

The News

pk.shafaqna.com

Categories:  
Tags:   PML-N ، nawaz sharif ، JIT ، Supreme Court ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)

Israel, Egypt gas agreement

- worldbulletin.net

Press agenda on February 23

- worldbulletin.net

Who is Ahad Cheema

- The News

Water shortage

- The News

Commits suicide

- The News