How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS
Search

Sharifs assets worth Rs58m 18 years back, court told

Who will keep Asma’s flame burning?

Sunnis are assured of Imam Mahdi’s reappearance: Sunni cleric

Bahraini Regime Committed Some 1,000 Human Rights Abuses in 1 Month: Report

Iran plane crash: All 66 people on board dead, says airline

Martyrdom of Hazrat Fatima (S.A)

The Story of Hazrat Fatima (sa), daughter of the Holy Prophet (pbuh)

US meddles in foreign nations elections for 'democracy': Ex CIA director

Zardari retracts statement calling Rao Anwar ‘brave kid’

PM sanctioned troop deployment to Saudi Arabia for ‘advisory purpose’

Shoaib Akhtar appointed PCB brand ambassador

‘Bajwa Doctrine’ working well against American blackmail

No militant camps exist on Pakistani soil: COAS

DRINKING HOT TEA CAN INCREASE RISK OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Cannot wait to lift PSL trophy in Karachi: Sammy

Are Young People Abandoning Facebook or Not?

What’s behind Iranian President’s India visit?

Abbasi decides to abolish Gilgit-Baltistan Council

Why Asif Zardari defended Rao Anwar?

Zainab’s murderer sentenced to death by hanging on four counts

The View of Islam on the People and the Government

Senate summons defence minister over sending troops to Saudi Arabia

Abbasi gives go-ahead to PIA, PSM privatisation

US security services express fear of Pakistan’s nuclear program

Myanmar ready to take back Rohingya refugees

Why Shia-Sunni Unity Is Necessary & Important? Ayatollah Khamenei's Opinion

Farooq Sattar backs down; withdraws from selection of Senate candidates

PML-N instigated me to speak against army, offered Senate ticket in return: Ayesha Gulalai

Kuwaiti Emir hails Iran’s role in war on ISIS terror group

Supreme Court issues contempt notice to Rao Anwar

US, UK joint efforts to put Pakistan on terror watchlist

Florida school terrorist supports Trump, white supremacy, hates Muslims

Hasan Ali doubtful for initial PSL matches, Umaid Asif joins as cover

PRESS TV | Takfiri groups, a creation of West to divide Muslims: Iran president

Supporting terrorists, main objective of US-led coalition: Syria

Pak Army destroys Indian post targeting innocent civilians along LoC

Pakistan to station army contingent in Saudi Arabia: ISPR

Asma Jahangir and pseudo liberalism – by Peja Mistry

CJ directs Nawaz Sharif’s counsel to focus on trial

Sayyed Razi: Life and Work

What led to the fall of MQM-P

Language being used by judges is not appropriate: Nawaz

Wooing Iran: Jandullah declared as banned outfit by Pakistan

UK to send Royal Navy warship through disputed South China Sea in challenge to Beijing

NA-154 defeat: Did People reject PTI?

Is Pakistan Shia Democrats Alliance formed under PSP agenda?

Are non-state actors trying to incite war between India and Pakistan?

US pushes motion to put Pakistan on global terrorist-financing watchlist

US launches full-scale confrontation with China: Scholar

France will strike if chemical weapons use proven in Syria: Macron

Strikes on Uighurs Show How Trump’s Afghan War Is Changing

Islamic Revolution of Iran united Muslims around the world, says Allama Sajid Naqvi

Kashmir from Nehru to Modi; what’s changed?

Pak-Afghan talks: Why a futile practice?

Afghan end game: How Pakistan pushed US in a closed street?

Turkey Struggles with Rising Death Toll in Afrin Invasion

Is Chief Justice of Pakistan clearing the way for Shahbaz Sharif?

Attack on military base: India threatens to unleash attacks on Pakistan

Report: ISIS’s Baghdadi Alive, but Trapped on ‘Island’

Downed Israeli jet changes all rules of engagement in region: Berri

Myanmar bulldozing villages in Rakhine to erase Rohingya history, show aerial photos

Saudi regime used US firm in Cyberwar on Qatar

The Politics of pipeline diplomacy

Imran Khan’s invitation: Would Ch.Nisar join PTI?

Shia Muslims stage sit-in to protest against Shia killings in Dera Ismail Khan

MEHR: Iran welcomes Iraq reconstruction conference in Kuwait

An Independent Journalist remembers Asma Jehangir

Taliban invites US senator for ‘mutual talks’ in Doha

An uphill task: Is the accountability of Pervez Musharraf possible?

Saudi regime forces kidnap three youths in Shia-populated Qatif

Rising tension: US to deploy 1,000s of troops near China’s border

Attack on Indian base in Occupied Kashmir leaves 12 dead

71 feared dead in Russia's passenger plane crash

Leading human rights lawyer Asma Jahangir passes away in Lahore

France has no absolute evidence on Syria chemical attack: Defense minister

PTI legislators sign candidacy of Taliban's godfather for Senator of Pakistan

Abaya not mandatory attire for Saudi women: Saudi mullah joins the Bin Salman's moderation drive

Cuba Claims Justin Trudeau Is Fidel Castro’s Son!

Modi becomes first Indian PM to visit Palestine

Would Ch.Nisar make a new faction of PML-N?

Enforced disappearances: A pretext to pressurize Pakistan

The self-destructive mode of MQM

Syria downs Israeli F-16 warplane: Start of new strategic phase says Hezbollah

‘No sign France reducing arms sales to Saudi-led coalition’

Church of England faces 3,300 sex abuse claims

Who is Kim Yo Jong? Kim Jong Un’s Sister is Rising Star

Turkey extends military deployment near Yemen

India vs Pakistan: Would US take another policy U-turn?

Rise of China: Beijing challenges US in Afghanistan

China, Russia voice support for Iran's nuclear deal amid US threats

Stashed abroad: A useless hunt to bring looted money back to Pakistan

Mysterious disappearance: Can Police find out Rao Anwar?

North Korean leader’s sister arrives in South for Olympics in historic visit

Sun to cool down in next 30 years: Study

Yemenis destroy Saudi-led missile system in Ta'izz with ballistic missile: Report

Another rift: Is this the end of MQM?

Jamaat-e-Islami says Islamic Revolution of Iran a role model for Ummah

PA: Japan to recognise Palestine state, increase aid

TTP's deputy chief believed to be killed in drone strike: officials

Abu Dhabi-Tel Aviv relations: From cold to warm times

2017-03-12 23:41:14

How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

400px-Anonymous_Venetian_orientalist_painting_The_Reception_of_the_Ambassadors_in_Damascus_1511_the_LouvreSHAFAQNA – The most outstanding feature of Islam is its history; if you study Islamic history, you would come to realize that Islam did not spread by force alone, it was the superior moral appeal of its peerless ethics that won the hearts and minds of medieval masses. For instance: Mongols conquered most of the eastern lands of the Islamic Empire during the thirteenth century, however, the Muslims of those lands did not convert to the religion of the conquerors: that is, the Mongolian Shamanism. Instead, the conquerors adopted the religion of the vanquished, i.e. Islam. Not only the Mongols, but several Turkish tribes also voluntarily converted to Islam. Such was the beauty of Islamic teachings and its sublime moral appeal in ancient times.

During the medieval times, when Europe was going through an age of intellectual and moral regression, Islamic culture thrived and flourished under the Abbasids, Ottomans and Mughals. Muslims ruled over India for more than six centuries; despite that, at the time of the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus outnumbered Muslims three to one (there were only 100 million Muslims in the population of 400 million Indians in 1947). That’s how tolerant and inclusive Islamic culture was back then. By comparison, the Red Indians of America and the Aborigines of Australia were reduced to a tiny minority of those continents after the European invasions.

The Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire were regarded as benevolent rulers by ancient historians. But when India was conquered by the British Empire, their Orientalist historians deliberately propagated the myth of supposedly “savage and rapacious” rule of Muslims in India in order to sow the seeds of dissension between Muslims and Hindus. In the nineteenth century, the newly established British education system in India deliberately portrayed Muslim rulers of India as marauders, rapists and looters in order to malign them. By contrast, the British rule in India was portrayed in a positive light: that the British Empire built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals in India.

If we were to compare the British and Muslim rules in India, the Muslim rulers at least resided in India and shared their wealth and fortune with their subjects. The British rule, on the other hand, was a foreign rule; the affairs of the state were run by viceroys and governors on the behalf of the monarchs of England who resided thousands of miles away in London. A small number of European colonizers in India treated their subjects as untouchables; they traded raw materials for pennies and sent finished goods back to the Indian market with huge profits, thus enriching themselves and the British Empire.

Up until 1857, the Hindus and Muslims of India were united enough to rise up in arms together against the British colonizers under the nominal command of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar. But after that, the British education system introduced by Lord Macaulay in India entrenched communal divisions and made it virtually impossible for Hindus and Muslims to understand each other, even though both religious communities were the victims of exploitation of foreign rule.

Regarding the notion peddled by the Orientalist historians that Muslims or Islam were somehow foreign to India, we need to settle on the definition of nativity first. If an Indian settles in the US, for instance, how would you define such a first generation immigrant? Since he was brought up in India and subsequently migrated to a Western country, therefore such a first generation Indian-American would have more in common with Indians than Americans, as such. But how would you identify the children of an immigrant who have been brought up and educated in the West? The second generation Indian-Americans, for all practical purposes, would be more American than Indian in their outlooks.

Similarly, although I concede that the invading armies of Muslim rulers from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran were foreign to India; but once they settled in India, made Delhi their seat of governance, intermarried and gave birth to Indian children, then how come the descendants of such benevolent rulers be labeled as foreign invaders? Excluding a few odd adventurers, like Mahmud of Ghazni, who had his seat of government in Afghanistan but plundered the wealth of India by conducting raids on Somnath, the Muslim rulers of India, particularly the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire, were as much native to India as the Hindu and Sikh rajas and maharajas.

Notwithstanding, the only true sociological definition of nation is ethno-linguistic group. The concept of modern nation state, particularly in multiethnic federations like India and Pakistan, is an artificial construct which is predicated on nothing substantive but on myths, fables and symbols. Rather than monolithic communities, the Hindus and Muslims of India were more parochial and tribal in character.

The astute Orientalist historians of British India debunked the myth of six centuries’ old Muslim rule in India by calling them “marauders” and substituted it with the fables of the pre-Christ Maurya Empire in order to forge and reify Hindu identity against Muslims. The primary concern of impoverished Indian masses was to earn bread and butter for their families. The metanarratives of Hindu and Muslim nationalism were taught by the British rulers, Hindu elites and Muslim ashrafiya to their subjects in order to distract and exploit them.

Here, let me clarify that I am not giving a free pass to the Muslim rulers of India. Their rule must have been as tyrannical as any other undemocratic, elitist rule throughout the history has been. I am only contending that the Muslim rulers were deliberately singled out and vilified in order to sow the seeds of dissension between the two communities.

After all, if the British rulers who resided in England and ruled over India can be hailed as saviors who built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals, not by academics but by common Indian citizens, then why can’t the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire that ensured peace and stability in India and built architectural wonders in Delhi, Lahore and Agra be granted a similar level of deference?

By the British divide-and-rule policy in the Indian context, it is generally assumed by Indian historians that the British rulers used the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority by giving the former preferential treatment, separate electorates etc. but the fact is often overlooked that the British imperialists in equal measure used the Hindus against the Muslims by vilifying the latter’s culture, rule and religion.

Moreover, the partition of Bengal on religious lines in 1905 was another classic instance of the British divide-and-rule policy through demographic change. In this case, the British imperialists cleverly partitioned the Hindu-majority Bengal province into the Muslim-majority East Bengal and the Hindu-majority West Bengal. As a consequence, the Hindus felt aggrieved and launched a mass movement against the partition; the Raj obliged the Hindus by accepting their demand of reunifying Bengal in 1911 which created a sense of alienation and deprivation among Muslims.

This time around, however, despite unifying the province along linguistic lines, at the same time the British rulers split up Bihar and Orissa province to the west and Assam province to the east; thus, reducing the initial Hindu majority (pre-1905) that included Bihar, Orissa and Assam, in favor of Muslim majority (post-1911) in the reunified Bengal. Additionally, the British rulers also devised separate electorates for Muslims in 1909; thus, pitting one community against the other which had lived peacefully for centuries before the arrival of British in India.

Finally, rather than cultivating inclusive Indian nationalism that would glorify Hindu, Muslim and Sikh identities and histories in equal measure, the British rulers maliciously nurtured exclusionary Hindu and Muslim nationalism in order to divide the communities and prolong the British rule. As several contemporary Indian historians have contended that Muslim nationalism in India was a reaction to exclusionary Hindu nationalism.

The political leadership of India was the product of British education system that forged artificial identities and entrenched communal divisions, therefore it was not possible for them to rise above their communal prejudices and work for the betterment of all Indians as a nation. This self-serving, divide-and-rule policy by the British rulers and their Hindu, Muslim and Sikh collaborators eventually led to a carnage and mass exodus of people on the eve of independence the likes of which history has seldom witnessed.

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and MENA regions, neocolonialism and Petroimperialism.

The original source of this article is Global Research

 
Categories:   Other News ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)