How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

The conference of shame and disgrace

Muslim countries participation in Riyadh’s meeting is contrary to Islamic values

Another gamble: Abbas to propose large-scale land swap with Israel

Denouncing Terror – Islam promotes the good and forbids the bad EDITORIAL

Shafaqna Interviews Brother Ali-Reza Goudarzi on the Architecture of the Holy Shrines

Bahraini forces attack a number of anti regime protesters

Murderers of Muslim Ummah: $380 billion to spill the blood of Muslims

A dangerous move: US’s Iranophobia for Saudi dollars

At least 22 killed, over 59 injured in suicide attack at Manchester concert

PM Nawaz condemns Manchester blast, calls for concerted efforts against terrorism

Rouhani’s re-election: The challenges ahead

War on extremism: The state, Maulana Abdul Aziz and Masood Azhar

A day dream: Can Trump Isolate Iran?

Indian army awards officer who tied Kashmiri man to jeep as human shield

Widow of 9/11 victim to Trump: Saudis should be held accountable for ‘role in murdering 3,000’

Why Muslims need to take part in their own affairs?

Conference on Takfirism to be held in Denmark

Ayatollah Bashir al-Najafi: “Clerics responsible to inform societies”

Imran slams Nawaz for being silent spectator at Saudi summit

The end of Trump

Moving Security Council after ICJ: Do India enjoy an upper hand in Yadav’s case?

Pakistanis ashamed at how PM Nawaz was treated in Saudi Arabia: Imran Khan

US Senator censures $110Bn arms sale to Saudis, citing atrocities in Yemen

US airstrike on Syrian Army proves Washington’s fake claims about war on terrorism

Syrian conflict:  Saudia diplomacy to foil peace talks

Rising threat: ‘Extremist outfits radicalising educated women in Karachi’

MWM Conference demands Pakistan’s withdraw from Saudi Military Alliance

Reasons why Arab NATO is doomed to failure

Iranian FM responds to Trump's anti-Tehran remarks

Robert Fisk from Independent: “Donald Trump’s speech to the Muslim world was filled with hypocrisy and condescension”

Trump’s Pro Saudi stance is a tragic continuation of US foreign policy of being aligned with the creators of Al Qaeda

I did not fast in my early years of adulthood, is it Wajib for me to compensate for those days and pay Kaffarah?

Writing a faith out of death’s throes – Shia Islam shall be silent no more …

Report documents evidence of attacks on Rohingya

Iran offers peace after bellicose Saudi threats

A nefarious agenda: How Saudia fooled Muslim Ummah for vest interests

Detaining Pakistani diplomats: Afghanistan’s quest for escalation with Pakistan

An unsolved mystery:  Why Govt is hesitant to arrest Lal mosque cleric?

Why Britain’s support for Bahrain king is unwavering?

US Senator censures $110Bn arms sale to Saudis, citing atrocities in Yemen

Trump visits Riyadh: Democracy, Human Rights out of; arms deal, Iranophobia top on agenda

JUI-F’s dirty politics on FATA reforms

ایران کے صدارتی انتخاب: ڈاکٹر حسن روحانی ایک بار پھر کامیاب

Hassan Rouhani wins another term as president of Iran

No iota of Shame: Saudia disgraces Trump by inviting a wanted President for war crimes

Rouhani leads Iran presidential race, expected to win

Appeasing a fanatic: Saudia’s penchant for anti-Muslim Trump

Grave mistake: India’s self imposed regional isolation

Yemenis fire ballistic missile at Riyadh ahead of Trump visit: Report

Polls close, vote counting underway in Iran

Saudi Arabia boosts US Treasury holdings ahead of Trump visit

Some signs of the time of re-appearance of Imam Mahdi (AJ)

Grand Shia scholar: Clerics adhere to Ahlul Bayt doctrine to serve society

Saudi Arabia’s ideology of exclusion and genocide

Blackwater returns to Iraq under new name

Saudi cleric calls on FIFA to ban sign of cross, Twitter fires back

No iota of Shame: Saudia disgraces Trump by inviting a wanted President for war crimes

Mahmoud Abbas on 3-day visit to India

Dawn leaks II: A new controversy

Verdict on Kulbhoshan and US’s influence on ICJ

Saudi ambassador to Cairo affirms Saudi efforts to disrupt US-Iran ties

Iranians to vote in pres. election in 102 countries: Foreign Ministry

Zionist ‘Axis of Evil’ against Iran

Why ICJ rushed to suspend execution of Indian spy?

Pakistan to form new team of lawyers on Kulbhushan Jadhav case: Sartaj

Key points of the judgment by International Court of Justice

U.S. New “Plan B” for Syria: Military Escalation

ICJ stays execution of Indian spy Jadhav pending final decision

Anti Russia hysteria makes the US mainstream press side with ISIS

A country ‘on its knees’: Cholera takes hold in war-weary Yemen

Top Shia leader ready for talks with Shia parties

Saudi Arabia rushing to normalize relations, amid Israeli silence

Why India has become an irrelevant power in South Asia?

Is US pressurizing Pakistan to release Kulbhoshan Yadav?

Trump administration renews Iran sanctions waivers

Saudi Regime lays siege on historical Shiite city, several killed

The other picture: Why did Nawaz Invite Jindal to Pakistan?

Perfect Footwear for Traveling That You Can Not Afford to Miss Upon

Famous Zoos In Pakistan

5 Beauty Tips to Try This Summer Season, Especially During Travelling

Is Saudi Arabia Waging a Holy Crusade Against Iran?

What is the most important task we have in this world?

Iran’s Supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei vows to enhance missile capability

Israeli minister says Assad should be killed

US trying to save Zionist-Wahhabi Axis in Middle East: Analyst

Innocent killings: Is Gawadar still at risk?

Labour govt. will ‘immediately recognize a state of Palestine’

Stability of Pakistan and Imam Mahdi Conference’ in Karachi on May 21

Trump to Saudia: A new hope for ISIS

Prolonging hunger strike: Would UN feel any shame?

Special Dua by Imam Sadeq (AS) to be recited at the time of the occultation of Imam Mahdi (AJ)

State of emergency over Cholera Outbreak In Sanaa, Yemen

Pakistan, Bangladesh ties need be strengthened: Info Minister

Obama officials, led by Kerry, team up to defend Iran deal from Trump

Yemen popular forces capture military base in Saudi Arabia

Cutting the Knot: Why Pakistan should divorce to Washington?

Cyber Crime law: Pakistan’s freedom of speech under threat

Nearly 30 million children across Arab world live in poverty: UNICEF

The sudden death of Mishaal bin Abdulaziz complicates the process of coup in Saudi Arabia

Saudi Shia town under 'siege' for sixth day

2017-03-12 23:41:14

How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

400px-Anonymous_Venetian_orientalist_painting_The_Reception_of_the_Ambassadors_in_Damascus_1511_the_LouvreSHAFAQNA – The most outstanding feature of Islam is its history; if you study Islamic history, you would come to realize that Islam did not spread by force alone, it was the superior moral appeal of its peerless ethics that won the hearts and minds of medieval masses. For instance: Mongols conquered most of the eastern lands of the Islamic Empire during the thirteenth century, however, the Muslims of those lands did not convert to the religion of the conquerors: that is, the Mongolian Shamanism. Instead, the conquerors adopted the religion of the vanquished, i.e. Islam. Not only the Mongols, but several Turkish tribes also voluntarily converted to Islam. Such was the beauty of Islamic teachings and its sublime moral appeal in ancient times.

During the medieval times, when Europe was going through an age of intellectual and moral regression, Islamic culture thrived and flourished under the Abbasids, Ottomans and Mughals. Muslims ruled over India for more than six centuries; despite that, at the time of the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus outnumbered Muslims three to one (there were only 100 million Muslims in the population of 400 million Indians in 1947). That’s how tolerant and inclusive Islamic culture was back then. By comparison, the Red Indians of America and the Aborigines of Australia were reduced to a tiny minority of those continents after the European invasions.

The Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire were regarded as benevolent rulers by ancient historians. But when India was conquered by the British Empire, their Orientalist historians deliberately propagated the myth of supposedly “savage and rapacious” rule of Muslims in India in order to sow the seeds of dissension between Muslims and Hindus. In the nineteenth century, the newly established British education system in India deliberately portrayed Muslim rulers of India as marauders, rapists and looters in order to malign them. By contrast, the British rule in India was portrayed in a positive light: that the British Empire built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals in India.

If we were to compare the British and Muslim rules in India, the Muslim rulers at least resided in India and shared their wealth and fortune with their subjects. The British rule, on the other hand, was a foreign rule; the affairs of the state were run by viceroys and governors on the behalf of the monarchs of England who resided thousands of miles away in London. A small number of European colonizers in India treated their subjects as untouchables; they traded raw materials for pennies and sent finished goods back to the Indian market with huge profits, thus enriching themselves and the British Empire.

Up until 1857, the Hindus and Muslims of India were united enough to rise up in arms together against the British colonizers under the nominal command of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar. But after that, the British education system introduced by Lord Macaulay in India entrenched communal divisions and made it virtually impossible for Hindus and Muslims to understand each other, even though both religious communities were the victims of exploitation of foreign rule.

Regarding the notion peddled by the Orientalist historians that Muslims or Islam were somehow foreign to India, we need to settle on the definition of nativity first. If an Indian settles in the US, for instance, how would you define such a first generation immigrant? Since he was brought up in India and subsequently migrated to a Western country, therefore such a first generation Indian-American would have more in common with Indians than Americans, as such. But how would you identify the children of an immigrant who have been brought up and educated in the West? The second generation Indian-Americans, for all practical purposes, would be more American than Indian in their outlooks.

Similarly, although I concede that the invading armies of Muslim rulers from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran were foreign to India; but once they settled in India, made Delhi their seat of governance, intermarried and gave birth to Indian children, then how come the descendants of such benevolent rulers be labeled as foreign invaders? Excluding a few odd adventurers, like Mahmud of Ghazni, who had his seat of government in Afghanistan but plundered the wealth of India by conducting raids on Somnath, the Muslim rulers of India, particularly the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire, were as much native to India as the Hindu and Sikh rajas and maharajas.

Notwithstanding, the only true sociological definition of nation is ethno-linguistic group. The concept of modern nation state, particularly in multiethnic federations like India and Pakistan, is an artificial construct which is predicated on nothing substantive but on myths, fables and symbols. Rather than monolithic communities, the Hindus and Muslims of India were more parochial and tribal in character.

The astute Orientalist historians of British India debunked the myth of six centuries’ old Muslim rule in India by calling them “marauders” and substituted it with the fables of the pre-Christ Maurya Empire in order to forge and reify Hindu identity against Muslims. The primary concern of impoverished Indian masses was to earn bread and butter for their families. The metanarratives of Hindu and Muslim nationalism were taught by the British rulers, Hindu elites and Muslim ashrafiya to their subjects in order to distract and exploit them.

Here, let me clarify that I am not giving a free pass to the Muslim rulers of India. Their rule must have been as tyrannical as any other undemocratic, elitist rule throughout the history has been. I am only contending that the Muslim rulers were deliberately singled out and vilified in order to sow the seeds of dissension between the two communities.

After all, if the British rulers who resided in England and ruled over India can be hailed as saviors who built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals, not by academics but by common Indian citizens, then why can’t the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire that ensured peace and stability in India and built architectural wonders in Delhi, Lahore and Agra be granted a similar level of deference?

By the British divide-and-rule policy in the Indian context, it is generally assumed by Indian historians that the British rulers used the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority by giving the former preferential treatment, separate electorates etc. but the fact is often overlooked that the British imperialists in equal measure used the Hindus against the Muslims by vilifying the latter’s culture, rule and religion.

Moreover, the partition of Bengal on religious lines in 1905 was another classic instance of the British divide-and-rule policy through demographic change. In this case, the British imperialists cleverly partitioned the Hindu-majority Bengal province into the Muslim-majority East Bengal and the Hindu-majority West Bengal. As a consequence, the Hindus felt aggrieved and launched a mass movement against the partition; the Raj obliged the Hindus by accepting their demand of reunifying Bengal in 1911 which created a sense of alienation and deprivation among Muslims.

This time around, however, despite unifying the province along linguistic lines, at the same time the British rulers split up Bihar and Orissa province to the west and Assam province to the east; thus, reducing the initial Hindu majority (pre-1905) that included Bihar, Orissa and Assam, in favor of Muslim majority (post-1911) in the reunified Bengal. Additionally, the British rulers also devised separate electorates for Muslims in 1909; thus, pitting one community against the other which had lived peacefully for centuries before the arrival of British in India.

Finally, rather than cultivating inclusive Indian nationalism that would glorify Hindu, Muslim and Sikh identities and histories in equal measure, the British rulers maliciously nurtured exclusionary Hindu and Muslim nationalism in order to divide the communities and prolong the British rule. As several contemporary Indian historians have contended that Muslim nationalism in India was a reaction to exclusionary Hindu nationalism.

The political leadership of India was the product of British education system that forged artificial identities and entrenched communal divisions, therefore it was not possible for them to rise above their communal prejudices and work for the betterment of all Indians as a nation. This self-serving, divide-and-rule policy by the British rulers and their Hindu, Muslim and Sikh collaborators eventually led to a carnage and mass exodus of people on the eve of independence the likes of which history has seldom witnessed.

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and MENA regions, neocolonialism and Petroimperialism.

The original source of this article is Global Research

 
Categories:   _Other News ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)

The city of litter

- Tribune PK

Manchester attack

- Tribune PK

Mental fitness

- Tribune PK

Defending Malala

- Tribune PK