How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

A veil of secrecy : What is Pakistan hiding from world regarding Raheel Sharif?

Another appeal: Would India come to Altaf Hussain’s rescue?

Would renaming Altaf Hussain university resolve issue of terrorism in Karachi?

All eyes on warm waters: Is Russia going to play a master stroke in Afghanistan?

Famine looms in Yemen: Saudia bombing intentionally targets food production

An act of dignity: Iran announces sanctions on 15 US companies

Killing innocent Yemenis: Hadi deserves  more than the death sentence

Who was behind the assassination attempt on Sayyed Muqtada al-Sadr?

Pakistan’s ‘unreformed’ madrassa enterprise

Raheel Sharif’s new task: What was the tacit deal?

Yemen children dream of school as war keeps them out

Mustapha Hamdan Martyred – Another Extra-Judicial Killing in Bahrain

Erdogan: European leaders are Nazis

The Optics of Blasphemy

Why Muslims cannot stop blasphemy on Social media?

JuD rally: Isn’t it fun of Radd-ul-Fassad?

Zionist’s cat is out of bag: ISIS declares it will kill Palestinians “One By One”!

Will the war in Syria go back to square one?

London attack: A reminder not to feed snakes

What is Erdogan’s plan: Why Europeans will not walk safely on their streets?

The enemy within: Did PPP commit treason?

Terror financing: The neglected case of terrorism funding in Pakistan

Saudi Arabia losses after two years of aggression on Yemen

 Dirty game: Zionists turned Western women into ‘sex object’

Babies deformed as Result of Using Chemical Weapons against Yemen

Polluting the education: The criminal silence on IJT hooliganism

The land of Sufis under threat: Can Sind Govt deal with Takfiris?

Would Iran resume its nuclear program?

Nearly 7 Million Suffering famine in War-Torn Yemen

Netanyahu seeks end to Russia airstrikes in Syria to avert Israel's collapse

Who is Ahlam al-Tamimi and why  Jordan refuses to extradite her to US?

Can Pakistan enact legislation preventing terrorists to enter in Politics?

Choosing Yogi Adityanath : Modi’s secret plan to push Muslims out of India

Blasphemous content: Is banning social media a solution?

Under Zionist pressure: How UN gave killing license to Israel?

Britain’s role in hunger and famine in Yemen

Shafaqna Analysis: How IJT is threatening education at Educational institutes?

Saudi Wahhabi monarchy dictates reconciliation between Ashrafi and Qasmi

The West’s sights are now clearly set on Iran

Shafaqna Special: Why UK is reluctant to take action against Altaf Hussain?

Trump and the al-Saud: An inside story

Four dead, including attacker, in UK parliament 'terror' assault

One shot, several injured in UK parliament 'terrorist incident'

Syrian conundrum: Is there any light at the end of the tunnel?

How foreign press discussed the new Iranian ‘Karrar’ tank?

London comes out against war in Syria

No iota of shame: How Mohamed Bin Salman, yielded to the New US president after insult

Finally the truth : Bangladesh Opposition leader blames India of Terrorism

Is Pakistan educated elite joining ISIS?

Downfall of ISIS: The crumbling Caliphate of Al-Baghdadi

Lobby rejects UN report penned by US Jew

Rabbani – the odd man out

Trump’s Alleged Rape Of 13-Year-Old Girl Isn't Going Away

An axis of evil: The link between terrorism and Madressahs

Inside Pak-Afghan ties and concept of strategic depth

Pak-India water talks resume today

Why religious education of children by parents is so important?

American Muslim teens learn to disarm Islamophobia

The Denationalization of American Muslims

Syrian on the path of peace: ISIS militants on constant retreat

Saudi-Israeli think tank begins its activities in the Kurdistan Region

A powerless organization: Is UN working against Muslims?

Orders on Asylum seekers: Why UN should force gulf countries to follow Iran’s Supreme leader’s advice?

Sharing the Saudi war crimes: US must not sell arms to Saudi Arabia

Shafaqna Special: Why did Saudi king cancelled Maldives visit

The extremists within: The radical ideology of PML-N

Western Muslims and the future of Islam in West

Elected committee of Muslims should protect Islam’s holy sites

What are the rewards of following the Prophet of Islam (PBUH) and Imam Ali (AS)?

Nowruz celebrations to begin on Monday

Raza Rabbani’s corrupt morality: Why does not Chairman Senate voice against Zardari’s corruption?

What is Turkey’s plan to kick off Jihad in Europe?

An inside story: How US arms are falling into hands of Al-Qaeda in Yemen

Plight of Pilgrims: State apathy towards shia community in Pakistan

The military Justice: Is the Civilian supremacy at stake?

UN's food agency says over 60 percent of Yemenis face famine

Islamic European Union of Shia Scholars condemns Sheikh Isa Qassim’s trial in Bahrain

Forty sayings of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h) About Fatima al-Zahra (SA)

Western Muslims and the future of Islam in West

Is The Hijab Being Turned Into Everything It Stands Against?

OBL killing: Why Pakistan concealed the Abbotabad commission report?

Sex slaves: ISIS repeats story of defenseless women in Afghanistan

The missing dots: Raheel Sharif and Pakistani troops in Saudi Arab

Trump’s new blunder: Giving CIA the license to kill

Astana talks: Is Turkey trying to derail peace process?

Is Hussain Haqqan a traitor?

Russian warning to Saudia: Russia steps in Yemen war

More than 1,500 children dead in two years of Yemen war: UN

Sexual harassment in Saudi Arabia up by 11.4% in 2016

Israel turns into Turkey’s only friend in the world

Terror bid foiled on FC camp at Shabqadar, two suicide bombers killed

Saudia- US honeymoon: A sign of continued spilling of Muslim’s blood

A fear within: Is Pakistan afraid of ISIS

Facebook delegation to visit Pakistan for talks over blasphemous content

The ruling about blaming (reproaching) others / the Grand Ayatollah Shobairi’s answer

Donald Trump Muslim ban: Google, Apple and other tech giants mysteriously drop off list of companies opposing order

Measuring discrimination in America against Christians and Muslims

Saudia- US honeymoon: A sign of continued spilling of Muslim’s blood

A systematic genocide: How Turkey is secretly killing Kurds

2017-03-12 23:41:14

How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

400px-Anonymous_Venetian_orientalist_painting_The_Reception_of_the_Ambassadors_in_Damascus_1511_the_LouvreSHAFAQNA – The most outstanding feature of Islam is its history; if you study Islamic history, you would come to realize that Islam did not spread by force alone, it was the superior moral appeal of its peerless ethics that won the hearts and minds of medieval masses. For instance: Mongols conquered most of the eastern lands of the Islamic Empire during the thirteenth century, however, the Muslims of those lands did not convert to the religion of the conquerors: that is, the Mongolian Shamanism. Instead, the conquerors adopted the religion of the vanquished, i.e. Islam. Not only the Mongols, but several Turkish tribes also voluntarily converted to Islam. Such was the beauty of Islamic teachings and its sublime moral appeal in ancient times.

During the medieval times, when Europe was going through an age of intellectual and moral regression, Islamic culture thrived and flourished under the Abbasids, Ottomans and Mughals. Muslims ruled over India for more than six centuries; despite that, at the time of the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus outnumbered Muslims three to one (there were only 100 million Muslims in the population of 400 million Indians in 1947). That’s how tolerant and inclusive Islamic culture was back then. By comparison, the Red Indians of America and the Aborigines of Australia were reduced to a tiny minority of those continents after the European invasions.

The Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire were regarded as benevolent rulers by ancient historians. But when India was conquered by the British Empire, their Orientalist historians deliberately propagated the myth of supposedly “savage and rapacious” rule of Muslims in India in order to sow the seeds of dissension between Muslims and Hindus. In the nineteenth century, the newly established British education system in India deliberately portrayed Muslim rulers of India as marauders, rapists and looters in order to malign them. By contrast, the British rule in India was portrayed in a positive light: that the British Empire built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals in India.

If we were to compare the British and Muslim rules in India, the Muslim rulers at least resided in India and shared their wealth and fortune with their subjects. The British rule, on the other hand, was a foreign rule; the affairs of the state were run by viceroys and governors on the behalf of the monarchs of England who resided thousands of miles away in London. A small number of European colonizers in India treated their subjects as untouchables; they traded raw materials for pennies and sent finished goods back to the Indian market with huge profits, thus enriching themselves and the British Empire.

Up until 1857, the Hindus and Muslims of India were united enough to rise up in arms together against the British colonizers under the nominal command of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar. But after that, the British education system introduced by Lord Macaulay in India entrenched communal divisions and made it virtually impossible for Hindus and Muslims to understand each other, even though both religious communities were the victims of exploitation of foreign rule.

Regarding the notion peddled by the Orientalist historians that Muslims or Islam were somehow foreign to India, we need to settle on the definition of nativity first. If an Indian settles in the US, for instance, how would you define such a first generation immigrant? Since he was brought up in India and subsequently migrated to a Western country, therefore such a first generation Indian-American would have more in common with Indians than Americans, as such. But how would you identify the children of an immigrant who have been brought up and educated in the West? The second generation Indian-Americans, for all practical purposes, would be more American than Indian in their outlooks.

Similarly, although I concede that the invading armies of Muslim rulers from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran were foreign to India; but once they settled in India, made Delhi their seat of governance, intermarried and gave birth to Indian children, then how come the descendants of such benevolent rulers be labeled as foreign invaders? Excluding a few odd adventurers, like Mahmud of Ghazni, who had his seat of government in Afghanistan but plundered the wealth of India by conducting raids on Somnath, the Muslim rulers of India, particularly the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire, were as much native to India as the Hindu and Sikh rajas and maharajas.

Notwithstanding, the only true sociological definition of nation is ethno-linguistic group. The concept of modern nation state, particularly in multiethnic federations like India and Pakistan, is an artificial construct which is predicated on nothing substantive but on myths, fables and symbols. Rather than monolithic communities, the Hindus and Muslims of India were more parochial and tribal in character.

The astute Orientalist historians of British India debunked the myth of six centuries’ old Muslim rule in India by calling them “marauders” and substituted it with the fables of the pre-Christ Maurya Empire in order to forge and reify Hindu identity against Muslims. The primary concern of impoverished Indian masses was to earn bread and butter for their families. The metanarratives of Hindu and Muslim nationalism were taught by the British rulers, Hindu elites and Muslim ashrafiya to their subjects in order to distract and exploit them.

Here, let me clarify that I am not giving a free pass to the Muslim rulers of India. Their rule must have been as tyrannical as any other undemocratic, elitist rule throughout the history has been. I am only contending that the Muslim rulers were deliberately singled out and vilified in order to sow the seeds of dissension between the two communities.

After all, if the British rulers who resided in England and ruled over India can be hailed as saviors who built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals, not by academics but by common Indian citizens, then why can’t the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire that ensured peace and stability in India and built architectural wonders in Delhi, Lahore and Agra be granted a similar level of deference?

By the British divide-and-rule policy in the Indian context, it is generally assumed by Indian historians that the British rulers used the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority by giving the former preferential treatment, separate electorates etc. but the fact is often overlooked that the British imperialists in equal measure used the Hindus against the Muslims by vilifying the latter’s culture, rule and religion.

Moreover, the partition of Bengal on religious lines in 1905 was another classic instance of the British divide-and-rule policy through demographic change. In this case, the British imperialists cleverly partitioned the Hindu-majority Bengal province into the Muslim-majority East Bengal and the Hindu-majority West Bengal. As a consequence, the Hindus felt aggrieved and launched a mass movement against the partition; the Raj obliged the Hindus by accepting their demand of reunifying Bengal in 1911 which created a sense of alienation and deprivation among Muslims.

This time around, however, despite unifying the province along linguistic lines, at the same time the British rulers split up Bihar and Orissa province to the west and Assam province to the east; thus, reducing the initial Hindu majority (pre-1905) that included Bihar, Orissa and Assam, in favor of Muslim majority (post-1911) in the reunified Bengal. Additionally, the British rulers also devised separate electorates for Muslims in 1909; thus, pitting one community against the other which had lived peacefully for centuries before the arrival of British in India.

Finally, rather than cultivating inclusive Indian nationalism that would glorify Hindu, Muslim and Sikh identities and histories in equal measure, the British rulers maliciously nurtured exclusionary Hindu and Muslim nationalism in order to divide the communities and prolong the British rule. As several contemporary Indian historians have contended that Muslim nationalism in India was a reaction to exclusionary Hindu nationalism.

The political leadership of India was the product of British education system that forged artificial identities and entrenched communal divisions, therefore it was not possible for them to rise above their communal prejudices and work for the betterment of all Indians as a nation. This self-serving, divide-and-rule policy by the British rulers and their Hindu, Muslim and Sikh collaborators eventually led to a carnage and mass exodus of people on the eve of independence the likes of which history has seldom witnessed.

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and MENA regions, neocolonialism and Petroimperialism.

The original source of this article is Global Research

 
Categories:   _Other News ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)

- siasat.pk/

:

- siasat.pk/

- siasat.pk/

- siasat.pk/

...

- siasat.pk/

- siasat.pk/

Loved and loathed

- BBC Asia

Fawlty language

- BBC Asia

- siasat.pk/

- siasat.pk/