How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS
Search

A Russia-Saudi rapprochement isn’t happening

US New Anti-Hezbollah Measures: Drives, Consequences

Why Political Government withdrew Hafiz Saeed’s house arrest plea?

Quetta Suicide attack: Seven including five police man martyred

Saudi Arabia is Increasing the Cost of Umrahs

What Next after US Provides Safe Exit for ISIS in Syria’s Raqqa?

Who are the Haqqanis, Afghanistan´s most feared insurgents?

Why is Russia ‘funding’ Afghan Taliban against rise of Islamic State?

Muscat Moot: Why US desperately looking for dialogues with Taliban?

False assumptions about Iran nuclear deal

Bahrain court sentences 4 dissidents to 15 years in prison

Nearly 300 Rohingya villages destroyed in Myanmar's Rakhine, says HRW

Saudi Arabia, Israel and America are misleading the world on the Iran nuclear deal

Fear and loathing returns for Quetta’s Hazara community

President Rouhani slams Trump’s remarks on Iran as pile of delusional claims

Paktia police chief among 32 killed in attacks on Afghan police centre

Indian role in Afghanistan: What is Pakistan’s paranoia?

Why is EU increasingly separating ways from Trump?

Is the party over?

Yemen President calls for international support

Egypt backtracks on opening Gaza border

Facebook rejected Saudi demand to remove Al-Jazeera page

US U-Turn: What made US to take policy turn on Islamabad?

ISIS Khorsan Province: another emerging giant?

ABNA | 4.5 Million Yemen school kids face uncertain future amid Saudi-led aggression

TASNIM | Tel Aviv behind Trump’s Anti-Iran Speech: US Analyst

SHAFAQNA | Media Blackout in Yemen – Journalist Support Committee denounces

IQNA | Plight of Myanmar Muslims Proof of West’s Double-Standards

The Fourth Imam, ‘Ali Ibn Al Husayn, Zainul Abedeen (as) .

Southern Yemen leader sees independence referendum, parliament body

Mayhem in Court: Is PML-N trying to alter the verdict?

Daesh used Raqqa as a base to plan attacks against the West.

Somalia's 'deadliest attack ever' kills 276, injures 300

Israeli minister says was misunderstood on war remarks with Iran

ISIS establishes training camp near Israeli border in Syria

Who altered the Khatm.e.Nabuwat clause?

Ending the Iran deal: Trump’s fatal mistake

Is Shahbaz Sharif trying to reconcile between establishment and Nawaz Sharif?

Show of restraint: How military poured cold water on PML-N’s whims?

Diplomacy with Pyongyang 'until the first bomb drops,' Tillerson vows

Report: Iraqi forces advance on Kurdish-held Kirkuk

Thanks to Pakistan: Will couple rescue mark a new beginning in ties with United States?

Bid to ‘fix’ Iran nuclear deal faces uphill climb in US Congress

US diplomats cast doubt on America’s ability to constrain Iran

Cracks in the party lines: Why PML-N is at the verge of disintegration?

Egypt becomes pawn in Trump’s N. Korea offensive

Karzai: Afghans Must Resist ‘US Agenda’

Jews against Shi’ite Community Center in London

The ‘Islamic Catalonia’!

Strategic Shift to Russia: Cost benefit analysis for Pakistan

Taking sides: PPP’s honeymoon with military establishment

Asteroid grazes past Earth in ‘critical’ rehearsal

Syria demands ‘immediate, unconditional’ pullout of Turkish troops from Idlib

Israeli study warns Netanyahu against ending Iran nuclear deal

US Daesh fighter in Syria poses dilemma for White House

The backdrop of Palestinian reconciliation

US rendezvous: Is Pakistan trying to woo back US?

Old tactics: PML-N repeats history by assailing the court

Warning to ISPR: Who is pulling Ahsan Iqbal’s strings?

Takfiri terrorism’s next station could be Southwest Asia

IB memo controversy: The motives behind fake letter

Pakistan’s path to sanity

Over 90% of Syrian territory free from Daesh: Russian daily

Trump refuses to certify Iran nuclear deal

Israeli report claimed Hawija was recaptured within deal with IS

The EU context for increasing financial aid to Palestine

Why Saudis welcome US sanctions on Hezbollah call for more?

‘UAE plans to invade Qatar using mercenaries’

IB memo controversy: The motives behind fake letter

Captain Safdar’s tirade: The game behind the curtains

Pulling out of Transit trade:  How India is manipulating ties with Afghanistan

PML-N's policy debacle: Rana Sanullah stirs new controversy on Ahmedis

Trump’s Iran plans pushing EU toward Russia, China: Germany

Rohingya Muslims not native to Myanmar: Army chief

IRNA | Speaker of Pakistan Balochistan Assembly underlines development of ties with Iran

MEHR | Trump to announce new Iran strategy Friday

IQNA | UN Report Details Brutal Myanmar Attempt to Drive Out Rohingya Muslims

ABNA | Saudi Arabia's next revolution: female taxi drivers

Arbaeen pilgrims can receive visas at airports, border crossings

How Israel takes advantage of Yemen crisis?

Sudanese call for Arab-Turkish-Iranian security treaty

Mysterious spike in radioactive particles across Europe baffles scientists

Fall in oil price pushes Abu Dhabi to sell bonds valued at $10bn

Sharif’s trial: The ticking clock for PML-N

Has Pakistan changed tack on the Haqqanis?

A well thought plan: Regaining lost religious vote through son in Law

Saudi Arabia’s outreach to Moscow underlines the loss of US influence

Why did General Rizwan Akhter took early retirment?

China scrambles fighter jets to deter US missile frigate

US continues efforts to demonize Hezbollah, says resistance movement official

Scientists discover a new brains vessels system

UK ‘preparing for war with North Korea’

Russian pundit: Iran primary target of KSA king’s visit to Russia

Australia Cricket Team’s Bus Attacked in India

Iraqi Sadr Movement threatens to storm parliament if electoral commission term extended

Uzair Baloch’s disclosures:  PPP in hot waters

Who is behind the secret death of the young leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party?

Afghanistan Airstrikes Hit Highest Point in Years

Ties with terrorists: How the IB was pressurized to declare the memo fake

Fingers towards CPEC: An Indian tongue in Trump’s mouth

2017-03-12 23:41:14

How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

400px-Anonymous_Venetian_orientalist_painting_The_Reception_of_the_Ambassadors_in_Damascus_1511_the_LouvreSHAFAQNA – The most outstanding feature of Islam is its history; if you study Islamic history, you would come to realize that Islam did not spread by force alone, it was the superior moral appeal of its peerless ethics that won the hearts and minds of medieval masses. For instance: Mongols conquered most of the eastern lands of the Islamic Empire during the thirteenth century, however, the Muslims of those lands did not convert to the religion of the conquerors: that is, the Mongolian Shamanism. Instead, the conquerors adopted the religion of the vanquished, i.e. Islam. Not only the Mongols, but several Turkish tribes also voluntarily converted to Islam. Such was the beauty of Islamic teachings and its sublime moral appeal in ancient times.

During the medieval times, when Europe was going through an age of intellectual and moral regression, Islamic culture thrived and flourished under the Abbasids, Ottomans and Mughals. Muslims ruled over India for more than six centuries; despite that, at the time of the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus outnumbered Muslims three to one (there were only 100 million Muslims in the population of 400 million Indians in 1947). That’s how tolerant and inclusive Islamic culture was back then. By comparison, the Red Indians of America and the Aborigines of Australia were reduced to a tiny minority of those continents after the European invasions.

The Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire were regarded as benevolent rulers by ancient historians. But when India was conquered by the British Empire, their Orientalist historians deliberately propagated the myth of supposedly “savage and rapacious” rule of Muslims in India in order to sow the seeds of dissension between Muslims and Hindus. In the nineteenth century, the newly established British education system in India deliberately portrayed Muslim rulers of India as marauders, rapists and looters in order to malign them. By contrast, the British rule in India was portrayed in a positive light: that the British Empire built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals in India.

If we were to compare the British and Muslim rules in India, the Muslim rulers at least resided in India and shared their wealth and fortune with their subjects. The British rule, on the other hand, was a foreign rule; the affairs of the state were run by viceroys and governors on the behalf of the monarchs of England who resided thousands of miles away in London. A small number of European colonizers in India treated their subjects as untouchables; they traded raw materials for pennies and sent finished goods back to the Indian market with huge profits, thus enriching themselves and the British Empire.

Up until 1857, the Hindus and Muslims of India were united enough to rise up in arms together against the British colonizers under the nominal command of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar. But after that, the British education system introduced by Lord Macaulay in India entrenched communal divisions and made it virtually impossible for Hindus and Muslims to understand each other, even though both religious communities were the victims of exploitation of foreign rule.

Regarding the notion peddled by the Orientalist historians that Muslims or Islam were somehow foreign to India, we need to settle on the definition of nativity first. If an Indian settles in the US, for instance, how would you define such a first generation immigrant? Since he was brought up in India and subsequently migrated to a Western country, therefore such a first generation Indian-American would have more in common with Indians than Americans, as such. But how would you identify the children of an immigrant who have been brought up and educated in the West? The second generation Indian-Americans, for all practical purposes, would be more American than Indian in their outlooks.

Similarly, although I concede that the invading armies of Muslim rulers from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran were foreign to India; but once they settled in India, made Delhi their seat of governance, intermarried and gave birth to Indian children, then how come the descendants of such benevolent rulers be labeled as foreign invaders? Excluding a few odd adventurers, like Mahmud of Ghazni, who had his seat of government in Afghanistan but plundered the wealth of India by conducting raids on Somnath, the Muslim rulers of India, particularly the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire, were as much native to India as the Hindu and Sikh rajas and maharajas.

Notwithstanding, the only true sociological definition of nation is ethno-linguistic group. The concept of modern nation state, particularly in multiethnic federations like India and Pakistan, is an artificial construct which is predicated on nothing substantive but on myths, fables and symbols. Rather than monolithic communities, the Hindus and Muslims of India were more parochial and tribal in character.

The astute Orientalist historians of British India debunked the myth of six centuries’ old Muslim rule in India by calling them “marauders” and substituted it with the fables of the pre-Christ Maurya Empire in order to forge and reify Hindu identity against Muslims. The primary concern of impoverished Indian masses was to earn bread and butter for their families. The metanarratives of Hindu and Muslim nationalism were taught by the British rulers, Hindu elites and Muslim ashrafiya to their subjects in order to distract and exploit them.

Here, let me clarify that I am not giving a free pass to the Muslim rulers of India. Their rule must have been as tyrannical as any other undemocratic, elitist rule throughout the history has been. I am only contending that the Muslim rulers were deliberately singled out and vilified in order to sow the seeds of dissension between the two communities.

After all, if the British rulers who resided in England and ruled over India can be hailed as saviors who built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals, not by academics but by common Indian citizens, then why can’t the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire that ensured peace and stability in India and built architectural wonders in Delhi, Lahore and Agra be granted a similar level of deference?

By the British divide-and-rule policy in the Indian context, it is generally assumed by Indian historians that the British rulers used the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority by giving the former preferential treatment, separate electorates etc. but the fact is often overlooked that the British imperialists in equal measure used the Hindus against the Muslims by vilifying the latter’s culture, rule and religion.

Moreover, the partition of Bengal on religious lines in 1905 was another classic instance of the British divide-and-rule policy through demographic change. In this case, the British imperialists cleverly partitioned the Hindu-majority Bengal province into the Muslim-majority East Bengal and the Hindu-majority West Bengal. As a consequence, the Hindus felt aggrieved and launched a mass movement against the partition; the Raj obliged the Hindus by accepting their demand of reunifying Bengal in 1911 which created a sense of alienation and deprivation among Muslims.

This time around, however, despite unifying the province along linguistic lines, at the same time the British rulers split up Bihar and Orissa province to the west and Assam province to the east; thus, reducing the initial Hindu majority (pre-1905) that included Bihar, Orissa and Assam, in favor of Muslim majority (post-1911) in the reunified Bengal. Additionally, the British rulers also devised separate electorates for Muslims in 1909; thus, pitting one community against the other which had lived peacefully for centuries before the arrival of British in India.

Finally, rather than cultivating inclusive Indian nationalism that would glorify Hindu, Muslim and Sikh identities and histories in equal measure, the British rulers maliciously nurtured exclusionary Hindu and Muslim nationalism in order to divide the communities and prolong the British rule. As several contemporary Indian historians have contended that Muslim nationalism in India was a reaction to exclusionary Hindu nationalism.

The political leadership of India was the product of British education system that forged artificial identities and entrenched communal divisions, therefore it was not possible for them to rise above their communal prejudices and work for the betterment of all Indians as a nation. This self-serving, divide-and-rule policy by the British rulers and their Hindu, Muslim and Sikh collaborators eventually led to a carnage and mass exodus of people on the eve of independence the likes of which history has seldom witnessed.

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and MENA regions, neocolonialism and Petroimperialism.

The original source of this article is Global Research

 
Categories:   Other News ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)