How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?
Video     Photos     Pakistan     World     Islam     Health     Crime     Islamic News     Business     Society     India     Travel     Middle East     Sport     sci/tech      Contact      RSS
Search

Palestinian Authority Threatens to Cut All Gaza Funds

The Saudi economy is smoldering down with Yemen’s fire; figures and facts

What experts say on Donald Trump’s Afghan policy?

Donald Trump threatens Venezuela with unspecified Military Option

Foreign Policy magazine: A UN report confirms the failure of the Saudi alliance in Yemen

Ex-Yemeni president stresses unity with Houthis against Saudi-led war

Iran to resume 20-percent enrichment in 5 days if necessary: Nuclear chief

The UAE has supported the spread of Al-Qaeda in Yemen, alleges UN report

Brutal torture: An insight into CIA’s inhuman investigation ways

Reluctant romance: Would Pakistan finally embrace Russia?

Defying NAB: Can Supreme Court order to arrest Nawaz Sharif and family?

West Indies to tour Pakistan in November

LUBP | Pakistan: A Failed State?

The world's top artificial intelligence companies are pleading for a ban on killer robots

Does Britain have a secret travel ban against Arabs?

International cricket returns to Pakistan

Over 4000 Shia pilgrims at risk of death in Pak-Iran border

America always ignite glowing splint of Gulf dispute to benefit from oil

Saudi Arabia Courts Iraq Alliance, Offering Reconstruction Aid

Saudi Arabia claims Qatar blocking flights to Mecca

The picture NASA doesn’t want you to see

The end of Dubai in ten years; The economic war in the Gulf of Oman

Last nail in Coffin: A deeper conspiracy against Nawaz Sharif

Shocking: Actual Price of Petrol and the Money Pakistan Govt Makes Per Liter in Taxes

ISIL Terrorists Paying Thousands of US Dollars to Human Traffickers While Fleeing Iraq

Donald Trump and the Iranian Resistance Block

IQNA | World Muslims Condemn Daesh Terrorist Attack in Spain

MEHR NEWS | Iran, Turkey not to allow division of Iraq

SUCH TV | NA-120 by-polls: PML-N rubbishes reports of rifts in Sharif family

EXCLUSIVE – Dire Consequences of Short-sighted Western Policy towards Middle East

MI5 chief: Hundreds of Britons fighting in Syria alongside terrorist groups

Israeli flag will be raised in independent Kurdistan, claims prominent Likud member

New UN Project; The Saudi alliance may be blacklisted

When Israel stabbed India

Why should not Tillerson’s remarks on Bahrain be taken seriously?

Fear within: Is ISIS recruiting Pakistan youth through technology?

With a wary eye on Iran, Saudi and Iraqi leaders draw closer

Egypt reassures Israel of Saudi’s vow to uphold peace treaty

Changing face of Syrian war: Saudi-Qatar row proves a big blow for terrorists

NA Speaker's 'reference' against Justice Asif Saeed Khosa: real or planted?

New acting president of PML-N:  Why Ch.Nisar is ignored again?

Saudi-Iranian détente: A slap in the face of US

Qatar worried about pilgrims’ safety in Saudi Arabia: FM

What US has gained by declaring Hizbul Mujahideen as Global terrorist?

Smart move: Is India trying to test US by engaging in military clash with China?

UN Report: Saudis Killed 502 Children in Yemen in Past Year

Cholera bomb: Who would save Yemen from mass annihilation?

‘Kill Muslims with bullets dipped in pig's blood’

The U.S. is stealing Syria’s ancient artifacts

Odd men out: NAB’s urgency to hear corruption cases against Zardari

Shafaqna insight: How is US helping India to suppress Kashmir’s freedom movement?

Why is Saudia keen to invest in CPEC and Gawadar?

Why is Tal Afar liberation significant?

Barcelona terror attack: How it happened and What we know

Lack of Investigation into US Strikes in Syria Proves Idlib Attack Was Staged

Al-Awamiya and beyond: Is Bin Salman looking for internal achievement?

US: Saudi Arabia, Bahrain Fail to Respect Religious Freedom

PCB issues show-cause notice to Akmal for allegations against coach Mickey Arthur

Syria says US, allies supplying terrorists with toxic agents

Al-Sadr heads to Egypt after concluding UAE visit

Why JuD opts for electoral politics?

Saudi Arabia denies seeking mediation with Iran

New party chief: Why Nawaz Sharif is heistant to handover party to Shahbaz Sharif?

Israel confiscates children’s toys in Jenin

Backdoor deals: Is PML-N going to make Zardari new president?

Is India applying Israeli model on Kashmir?

Israeli rabbis smuggling, selling Jewish babies in US: Report

Iran supreme leader mocks US over Charlottesville

The fall of the UAE plane was plotted to assassinate Zayed bin Hamdan!!!

Iran becomes the first country to sanction America over terrorism support

US Could Drop Neutron Bomb on North Korea

Rabaa massacre was the murder of a country

Saudi-led siege can’t bring Qatar to its knees: Senior official

Dogs and Negros not allowed: US towards new apartheid under Trump

Taliban’s advice: Would Trump abandon Afghanistan?

Ugly face of India: How the righting Hindus pressurizing Govt to deport Rohingyas

Snakes bite the master: JuD to contest Kalsoom Nawaz

WikiLeaks leaks new details on the normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel

Iran could quit nuclear deal in 'hours' if new U.S. sanctions imposed: Rouhani

There are almost 100 new volcanoes hiding under Antarctic ice

Countering Resistance on Behalf of ‘Israel’

Details emerge of Saudi Arabia’s kidnapping of defecting royals

Saudi crown prince ‘wants out’ of war on Yemen: Leaked emails

Yemen bank: UAE stopping employee salaries reaching Aden

Israel steals important Jerusalem property deeds from Al-Aqsa

Quetta blast: Why Pakistan failed to completely annihilate terrorism?

Afghan imbroglio: How Kingdom deceived Qatar and Washington

How Shahid Khaqan Abbasi was persuaded for Premiership?

Unusual activism:  Is Nawaz Sharif trying to to avert imprisonment by public shows?

New clothes: Would JuD completely transform into a political party?

American warning on a repeat of Yemen’s catastrophe in Bahrain

China says countdown for war with India has begun

PTI’s pamphlets: Nawaz Sharif’s blunder of GT road rally

Rule of stupid: Would Trump push the world into a another nuclear war?

Strengthening the ranks of Takfiri groups through Aden airport to legitimize American entry in southern Yemen

Mending fences with Sunni states: After Saudia, Muqtada al-Sadr reaches UAE

Baghdad urged to mediate between Riyadh, Tehran: Iraqi minister

Venezuela’s opposition rejects Trump’s military intervention remarks

What drives UAE participation in Yemen War?

Pakistan celebrates 70th independence day

2017-03-12 23:41:14

How Orientalism Pitted Hindus against Muslims in India?

400px-Anonymous_Venetian_orientalist_painting_The_Reception_of_the_Ambassadors_in_Damascus_1511_the_LouvreSHAFAQNA – The most outstanding feature of Islam is its history; if you study Islamic history, you would come to realize that Islam did not spread by force alone, it was the superior moral appeal of its peerless ethics that won the hearts and minds of medieval masses. For instance: Mongols conquered most of the eastern lands of the Islamic Empire during the thirteenth century, however, the Muslims of those lands did not convert to the religion of the conquerors: that is, the Mongolian Shamanism. Instead, the conquerors adopted the religion of the vanquished, i.e. Islam. Not only the Mongols, but several Turkish tribes also voluntarily converted to Islam. Such was the beauty of Islamic teachings and its sublime moral appeal in ancient times.

During the medieval times, when Europe was going through an age of intellectual and moral regression, Islamic culture thrived and flourished under the Abbasids, Ottomans and Mughals. Muslims ruled over India for more than six centuries; despite that, at the time of the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, Hindus outnumbered Muslims three to one (there were only 100 million Muslims in the population of 400 million Indians in 1947). That’s how tolerant and inclusive Islamic culture was back then. By comparison, the Red Indians of America and the Aborigines of Australia were reduced to a tiny minority of those continents after the European invasions.

The Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire were regarded as benevolent rulers by ancient historians. But when India was conquered by the British Empire, their Orientalist historians deliberately propagated the myth of supposedly “savage and rapacious” rule of Muslims in India in order to sow the seeds of dissension between Muslims and Hindus. In the nineteenth century, the newly established British education system in India deliberately portrayed Muslim rulers of India as marauders, rapists and looters in order to malign them. By contrast, the British rule in India was portrayed in a positive light: that the British Empire built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals in India.

If we were to compare the British and Muslim rules in India, the Muslim rulers at least resided in India and shared their wealth and fortune with their subjects. The British rule, on the other hand, was a foreign rule; the affairs of the state were run by viceroys and governors on the behalf of the monarchs of England who resided thousands of miles away in London. A small number of European colonizers in India treated their subjects as untouchables; they traded raw materials for pennies and sent finished goods back to the Indian market with huge profits, thus enriching themselves and the British Empire.

Up until 1857, the Hindus and Muslims of India were united enough to rise up in arms together against the British colonizers under the nominal command of the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar. But after that, the British education system introduced by Lord Macaulay in India entrenched communal divisions and made it virtually impossible for Hindus and Muslims to understand each other, even though both religious communities were the victims of exploitation of foreign rule.

Regarding the notion peddled by the Orientalist historians that Muslims or Islam were somehow foreign to India, we need to settle on the definition of nativity first. If an Indian settles in the US, for instance, how would you define such a first generation immigrant? Since he was brought up in India and subsequently migrated to a Western country, therefore such a first generation Indian-American would have more in common with Indians than Americans, as such. But how would you identify the children of an immigrant who have been brought up and educated in the West? The second generation Indian-Americans, for all practical purposes, would be more American than Indian in their outlooks.

Similarly, although I concede that the invading armies of Muslim rulers from Central Asia, Afghanistan and Iran were foreign to India; but once they settled in India, made Delhi their seat of governance, intermarried and gave birth to Indian children, then how come the descendants of such benevolent rulers be labeled as foreign invaders? Excluding a few odd adventurers, like Mahmud of Ghazni, who had his seat of government in Afghanistan but plundered the wealth of India by conducting raids on Somnath, the Muslim rulers of India, particularly the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire, were as much native to India as the Hindu and Sikh rajas and maharajas.

Notwithstanding, the only true sociological definition of nation is ethno-linguistic group. The concept of modern nation state, particularly in multiethnic federations like India and Pakistan, is an artificial construct which is predicated on nothing substantive but on myths, fables and symbols. Rather than monolithic communities, the Hindus and Muslims of India were more parochial and tribal in character.

The astute Orientalist historians of British India debunked the myth of six centuries’ old Muslim rule in India by calling them “marauders” and substituted it with the fables of the pre-Christ Maurya Empire in order to forge and reify Hindu identity against Muslims. The primary concern of impoverished Indian masses was to earn bread and butter for their families. The metanarratives of Hindu and Muslim nationalism were taught by the British rulers, Hindu elites and Muslim ashrafiya to their subjects in order to distract and exploit them.

Here, let me clarify that I am not giving a free pass to the Muslim rulers of India. Their rule must have been as tyrannical as any other undemocratic, elitist rule throughout the history has been. I am only contending that the Muslim rulers were deliberately singled out and vilified in order to sow the seeds of dissension between the two communities.

After all, if the British rulers who resided in England and ruled over India can be hailed as saviors who built roads and railways and established schools, colleges and hospitals, not by academics but by common Indian citizens, then why can’t the Sultanate of Delhi and the Mughal Empire that ensured peace and stability in India and built architectural wonders in Delhi, Lahore and Agra be granted a similar level of deference?

By the British divide-and-rule policy in the Indian context, it is generally assumed by Indian historians that the British rulers used the Muslim minority against the Hindu majority by giving the former preferential treatment, separate electorates etc. but the fact is often overlooked that the British imperialists in equal measure used the Hindus against the Muslims by vilifying the latter’s culture, rule and religion.

Moreover, the partition of Bengal on religious lines in 1905 was another classic instance of the British divide-and-rule policy through demographic change. In this case, the British imperialists cleverly partitioned the Hindu-majority Bengal province into the Muslim-majority East Bengal and the Hindu-majority West Bengal. As a consequence, the Hindus felt aggrieved and launched a mass movement against the partition; the Raj obliged the Hindus by accepting their demand of reunifying Bengal in 1911 which created a sense of alienation and deprivation among Muslims.

This time around, however, despite unifying the province along linguistic lines, at the same time the British rulers split up Bihar and Orissa province to the west and Assam province to the east; thus, reducing the initial Hindu majority (pre-1905) that included Bihar, Orissa and Assam, in favor of Muslim majority (post-1911) in the reunified Bengal. Additionally, the British rulers also devised separate electorates for Muslims in 1909; thus, pitting one community against the other which had lived peacefully for centuries before the arrival of British in India.

Finally, rather than cultivating inclusive Indian nationalism that would glorify Hindu, Muslim and Sikh identities and histories in equal measure, the British rulers maliciously nurtured exclusionary Hindu and Muslim nationalism in order to divide the communities and prolong the British rule. As several contemporary Indian historians have contended that Muslim nationalism in India was a reaction to exclusionary Hindu nationalism.

The political leadership of India was the product of British education system that forged artificial identities and entrenched communal divisions, therefore it was not possible for them to rise above their communal prejudices and work for the betterment of all Indians as a nation. This self-serving, divide-and-rule policy by the British rulers and their Hindu, Muslim and Sikh collaborators eventually led to a carnage and mass exodus of people on the eve of independence the likes of which history has seldom witnessed.

Nauman Sadiq is an Islamabad-based attorney, columnist and geopolitical analyst focused on the politics of Af-Pak and MENA regions, neocolonialism and Petroimperialism.

The original source of this article is Global Research

 
Categories:   Other News ،
From other agencies (RSS Reader)

Stock markets snap back

- dunyanews.tv